pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (67%).

31 Pith papers citing it
Background 67% of classified citations
abstract

We investigate the ability of language models to perform compositional reasoning tasks where the overall solution depends on correctly composing the answers to sub-problems. We measure how often models can correctly answer all sub-problems but not generate the overall solution, a ratio we call the compositionality gap. We evaluate this ratio by asking multi-hop questions with answers that require composing multiple facts unlikely to have been observed together during pretraining. In the GPT-3 family of models, as model size increases we show that the single-hop question answering performance improves faster than the multi-hop performance does, therefore the compositionality gap does not decrease. This surprising result suggests that while more powerful models memorize and recall more factual knowledge, they show no corresponding improvement in their ability to perform this kind of compositional reasoning. We then demonstrate how elicitive prompting (such as chain of thought) narrows the compositionality gap by reasoning explicitly. We present a new method, self-ask, that further improves on chain of thought. In our method, the model explicitly asks itself (and answers) follow-up questions before answering the initial question. We finally show that self-ask's structured prompting lets us easily plug in a search engine to answer the follow-up questions, which additionally improves accuracy.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4 baseline 1 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training

cs.LG · 2025-05-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

GiGPO adds a hierarchical grouping mechanism to group-based RL so that LLM agents receive both global trajectory and local step-level credit signals, yielding >12% gains on ALFWorld and >9% on WebShop over GRPO while keeping the same rollout and memory footprint.

Holistic Evaluation of Language Models

cs.CL · 2022-11-16 · accept · novelty 7.0

HELM establishes a multi-metric evaluation covering 30 language models on 42 scenarios (16 core) to raise average scenario coverage from 17.9% to 96% under uniform conditions while releasing all prompts, completions, and a toolkit.

EVE-Agent: Evidence-Verifiable Self-Evolving Agents

cs.AI · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

EVE-Agent adds an evidence verifier to the proposer-solver loop that rewards spans by marginal accuracy gain, producing self-generated but inspectable training examples for search agents.

RadThinking: A Dataset for Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning in Radiology

cs.CV · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RadThinking releases a large longitudinal CT VQA dataset stratified into foundation perception questions, single-rule reasoning questions, and compositional multi-step chains grounded in clinical reporting standards for cancer screening.

EvolveR: Self-Evolving LLM Agents through an Experience-Driven Lifecycle

cs.CL · 2025-10-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

EvolveR enables LLM agents to self-evolve via a closed loop of distilling interaction trajectories into strategic principles offline and retrieving them to guide online decisions with policy reinforcement, yielding better results on multi-hop QA benchmarks.

How Do Language Models Compose Functions?

cs.CL · 2025-10-02 · conditional · novelty 6.0

LLMs solve compositional factual recall either by computing intermediates or directly, with mechanism choice correlated to translation geometry in embedding spaces.

ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs

cs.LG · 2025-04-16 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A principled reward design for tool selection and application in RL-trained LLMs delivers 17% gains over base models and 15% over SFT across benchmarks.

Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks

cs.CL · 2023-03-30 · accept · novelty 6.0

Pre-trained LLMs using recursive criticism and improvement prompting achieve state-of-the-art results on the MiniWoB++ computer task benchmark with only a handful of demonstrations and no task-specific reward function.

citing papers explorer

Showing 31 of 31 citing papers.