In the Flux environment, RL agents with explicit latent state access achieve ~79% win rate versus ~11% for LLMs on long-horizon tasks, illustrating limitations of sequence prediction for dynamic reasoning.
Reasoning capabilities of large language models on dynamic tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10543, 2025
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Why We Need World Models for AGI: Where LLMs Fail and How World Models May Outperform
In the Flux environment, RL agents with explicit latent state access achieve ~79% win rate versus ~11% for LLMs on long-horizon tasks, illustrating limitations of sequence prediction for dynamic reasoning.