Stochastic LLG and linear response theory agree for weak fields but deviate with sign and size set by ωτ_N, with LRT underestimating SAR by ~70% above resonance at ξ~2.
(2013), ``Accuracy of available methods for quantifying the heat power generation of nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' Int
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Re-analysis of RADIOMAG round-robin data identifies four instrumentation issues in non-adiabatic AC calorimetry for magnetic hyperthermia and proposes quality criteria plus slope-curve diagnostics that reduce inter-lab ILP variation by up to 38%.
Insulation temperature rise introduces systematic errors in the corrected slope method for magnetic nanoparticle heating power estimation; local sample-to-environment temperature difference is proposed as correction.
citing papers explorer
-
Specific absorption rate of uniaxial single-domain nanomagnets: stochastic spin dynamics versus linear response theory
Stochastic LLG and linear response theory agree for weak fields but deviate with sign and size set by ωτ_N, with LRT underestimating SAR by ~70% above resonance at ξ~2.
-
Unravelling Challenges in Heating Power Measurements for Magnetic Hyperthermia -- the RADIOMAG Round Robin Study Revisited
Re-analysis of RADIOMAG round-robin data identifies four instrumentation issues in non-adiabatic AC calorimetry for magnetic hyperthermia and proposes quality criteria plus slope-curve diagnostics that reduce inter-lab ILP variation by up to 38%.
-
The impact of sample insulation on estimating the heating power of magnetic nanoparticles by AC calorimetry
Insulation temperature rise introduces systematic errors in the corrected slope method for magnetic nanoparticle heating power estimation; local sample-to-environment temperature difference is proposed as correction.