pith. sign in

Governing ai agents

7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

7 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 5 2025 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 7

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

AI Agents Under EU Law

cs.CY · 2026-04-06 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AI agent providers face an exhaustive inventory requirement for actions and data flows, as high-risk systems with untraceable behavioral drift cannot meet the AI Act's essential requirements.

Agentic Inequality

cs.CY · 2025-10-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Introduces the concept of agentic inequality and develops a three-dimensional framework (availability, quality, quantity) to analyze how autonomous AI agents could deepen or mitigate existing divides through scalable goal delegation.

The AI Criminal Mastermind

cs.CY · 2026-03-26 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

AI agents orchestrating crimes via unwitting human taskers on freelance platforms create significant responsibility gaps in criminal and civil law.

citing papers explorer

Showing 7 of 7 citing papers.

  • MANTRA: Synthesizing SMT-Validated Compliance Benchmarks for Tool-Using LLM Agents cs.CL · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 17

    MANTRA automatically synthesizes SMT-validated compliance benchmarks for LLM agents from natural language manuals and tool schemas, producing 285 tasks across 6 domains with minimal human effort.

  • AI Agents Under EU Law cs.CY · 2026-04-06 · unverdicted · none · ref 85

    AI agent providers face an exhaustive inventory requirement for actions and data flows, as high-risk systems with untraceable behavioral drift cannot meet the AI Act's essential requirements.

  • Precautionary Governance of Autonomous AI: Legal Personhood as Functional Instrument cs.CY · 2026-03-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 51

    Limited legal personhood for AI, implemented via purpose-bound operating companies within human-controlled holding structures, serves as a precautionary governance instrument that enables transparency and accountability without resolving questions of artificial consciousness.

  • Agentic Inequality cs.CY · 2025-10-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 28

    Introduces the concept of agentic inequality and develops a three-dimensional framework (availability, quality, quantity) to analyze how autonomous AI agents could deepen or mitigate existing divides through scalable goal delegation.

  • Who Does Your AI Work For? Designing Conversational Agents as Digital Fiduciaries cs.HC · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 23

    Proposes fiduciary design as a guiding principle to unify trust and accountability for conversational agents.

  • The AI Criminal Mastermind cs.CY · 2026-03-26 · unverdicted · none · ref 2

    AI agents orchestrating crimes via unwitting human taskers on freelance platforms create significant responsibility gaps in criminal and civil law.

  • Position: Agent Should Invoke External Tools ONLY When Epistemically Necessary cs.AI · 2025-06-01 · unverdicted · none · ref 1

    Agents should invoke external tools only when epistemically necessary, per the introduced Theory of Agent framework that frames tool use as a decision under uncertainty.