The 2025 AI Agent Index catalogs technical and safety details for 30 deployed AI agents and finds low developer transparency on safety, evaluations, and societal impacts.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12170 , year =
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 4roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
A framework recommending that frontier AI developers disclose information on capabilities, usage, safety mitigations, and governance of internal model deployments.
A harmonized risk reporting standard for internal frontier AI model use, structured around autonomous misbehavior and insider threats using means, motive, and opportunity factors.
Interpretations of Articles 2(1), 2(6), and 2(8) of the AI Act support applying the regulation to internal AI deployment while allowing for R&D exceptions, with the provisions viewed as complementary.
citing papers explorer
-
What Should Frontier AI Developers Disclose About Internal Deployments?
A framework recommending that frontier AI developers disclose information on capabilities, usage, safety mitigations, and governance of internal model deployments.
-
Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Use
A harmonized risk reporting standard for internal frontier AI model use, structured around autonomous misbehavior and insider threats using means, motive, and opportunity factors.
-
Internal Deployment in the AI Act
Interpretations of Articles 2(1), 2(6), and 2(8) of the AI Act support applying the regulation to internal AI deployment while allowing for R&D exceptions, with the provisions viewed as complementary.