pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time , ISBN=

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 2

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 2

polarities

background 1 unclear 1

representative citing papers

Online Learning-to-Defer with Varying Experts

stat.ML · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

Presents the first online learning-to-defer algorithm with regret bounds O((n + n_e) T^{2/3}) generally and O((n + n_e) sqrt(T)) under low noise for multiclass classification with varying experts.

When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?

cs.AI · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AI peer review systems are vulnerable to prompt injections, prestige biases, assertion strength effects, and contextual poisoning, as demonstrated by a new attack taxonomy and causal experiments on real conference submissions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Online Learning-to-Defer with Varying Experts stat.ML · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · none · ref 27

    Presents the first online learning-to-defer algorithm with regret bounds O((n + n_e) T^{2/3}) generally and O((n + n_e) sqrt(T)) under low noise for multiclass classification with varying experts.

  • When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee? cs.AI · 2026-04-26 · unverdicted · none · ref 62

    AI peer review systems are vulnerable to prompt injections, prestige biases, assertion strength effects, and contextual poisoning, as demonstrated by a new attack taxonomy and causal experiments on real conference submissions.