Inverse Turing Bench evaluates LLMs on distinguishing human-human from human-AI dialogues, with GPTZero at 89.41%, Claude Opus-4.6 at 77.92%, and GPT-5.5 at 75.94% accuracy.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author=
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Inverse Turing Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Judges of Human vs. AI Dialogue
Inverse Turing Bench evaluates LLMs on distinguishing human-human from human-AI dialogues, with GPTZero at 89.41%, Claude Opus-4.6 at 77.92%, and GPT-5.5 at 75.94% accuracy.