Adaptive scheduling of interventions in discrete diffusion language models, timed to attribute-specific commitment schedules discovered with sparse autoencoders, delivers precise multi-attribute steering up to 93% strength while preserving generation quality.
Interpretability without actionability: mechanistic methods cannot correct language model errors despite near-perfect internal representations
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
AI deployment in high-stakes areas requires domain-scoped calibrated verification with monitoring and revocation, using a proposed six-component Verification Coverage standard instead of mechanistic interpretability.
Overthinking in medical QA is linearly decodable at 71.6% accuracy yet fixed residual-stream steering yields no correction across 29 configurations, while enabling selective abstention with AUROC 0.610.
citing papers explorer
-
Steering Without Breaking: Mechanistically Informed Interventions for Discrete Diffusion Language Models
Adaptive scheduling of interventions in discrete diffusion language models, timed to attribute-specific commitment schedules discovered with sparse autoencoders, delivers precise multi-attribute steering up to 93% strength while preserving generation quality.
-
The Open-Box Fallacy: Why AI Deployment Needs a Calibrated Verification Regime
AI deployment in high-stakes areas requires domain-scoped calibrated verification with monitoring and revocation, using a proposed six-component Verification Coverage standard instead of mechanistic interpretability.
-
Decodable but Not Corrected by Fixed Residual-Stream Linear Steering: Evidence from Medical LLM Failure Regimes
Overthinking in medical QA is linearly decodable at 71.6% accuracy yet fixed residual-stream steering yields no correction across 29 configurations, while enabling selective abstention with AUROC 0.610.