Outcome-fair credit models often exhibit hidden procedural bias through inconsistent reasoning across groups, which the CEC framework mitigates by enforcing consistent feature attributions via counterfactuals.
Applied Soft Computing , volume=
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 2representative citing papers
TAP couples a learner-conditioned policy with diffusion inpainting to generate and selectively inject high-utility tabular augmentations, yielding up to 15.6 pp accuracy gains and 32% RMSE reduction on seven datasets under severe scarcity.
citing papers explorer
-
Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions
Outcome-fair credit models often exhibit hidden procedural bias through inconsistent reasoning across groups, which the CEC framework mitigates by enforcing consistent feature attributions via counterfactuals.
-
Active Tabular Augmentation via Policy-Guided Diffusion Inpainting
TAP couples a learner-conditioned policy with diffusion inpainting to generate and selectively inject high-utility tabular augmentations, yielding up to 15.6 pp accuracy gains and 32% RMSE reduction on seven datasets under severe scarcity.