Constrained ABA (CABA) introduces non-ground arguments with constrained variables and defines semantics that conservatively generalize standard ground ABA.
TheASPIC + framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial.Argument and Computation, 5(1):31–62
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.AI 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
ASPIC+ frameworks with uncertain preferences have limited expressivity relative to abstract uncertain-defeat models, shown via negative results and preliminary proofs toward a conjectured non-trivial threshold.
The authors define Deontic Argumentation Theory and introduce a new semantics supporting weak permission, unlike grounded semantics in obligation conflicts.
citing papers explorer
-
Constrained Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Constrained ABA (CABA) introduces non-ground arguments with constrained variables and defines semantics that conservatively generalize standard ground ABA.
-
Some Results about the Expressivity of Preference-Incomplete Structured Argumentation Frameworks
ASPIC+ frameworks with uncertain preferences have limited expressivity relative to abstract uncertain-defeat models, shown via negative results and preliminary proofs toward a conjectured non-trivial threshold.
-
Deontic Argumentation
The authors define Deontic Argumentation Theory and introduce a new semantics supporting weak permission, unlike grounded semantics in obligation conflicts.