Astrophysical S-factor data constrain variations in the electromagnetic fine-structure constant to |δ α/α| ≤ 0.0002 in radiative alpha capture on carbon-12.
Primordial nucleosynthesis as a probe of fundamental physics parameters
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We analyze the effect of variation of fundamental couplings and mass scales on primordial nucleosynthesis in a systematic way. The first step establishes the response of primordial element abundances to the variation of a large number of nuclear physics parameters, including nuclear binding energies. We find a strong influence of the n-p mass difference (for the 4He abundance), of the nucleon mass (for deuterium) and of A=3,4,7 binding energies (for 3He, 6Li and 7Li). A second step relates the nuclear parameters to the parameters of the Standard Model of particle physics. The deuterium, and, above all, 7Li abundances depend strongly on the average light quark mass hat{m} \equiv (m_u+m_d)/2. We calculate the behaviour of abundances when variations of fundamental parameters obey relations arising from grand unification. We also discuss the possibility of a substantial shift in the lithium abundance while the deuterium and 4He abundances are only weakly affected.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
Extending a BBN code yields constraints Δα/α = 2 ± 51 ppm (mass variation) and 2 ± 22 ppm (G variation) at 68% CL, showing these models do not solve the lithium problem.
citing papers explorer
-
Fine-tunings in radiative $\alpha$-particle capture on $^{12}$C at astrophysical energies
Astrophysical S-factor data constrain variations in the electromagnetic fine-structure constant to |δ α/α| ≤ 0.0002 in radiative alpha capture on carbon-12.
-
Probing Unification Scenarios with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
Extending a BBN code yields constraints Δα/α = 2 ± 51 ppm (mass variation) and 2 ± 22 ppm (G variation) at 68% CL, showing these models do not solve the lithium problem.