Heat-flow and guarded-heater methods agree on module efficiency up to 70 K temperature difference, while the AC Harman method underestimates efficiency by about 30% due to radiative losses and boundary-condition effects.
Bjørk, Journal of Electronic Materials44, 2869 (2015)
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
physics.app-ph 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Quantitative comparison of heat flow, guarded-heater and AC Harman methods for thermoelectric module efficiency
Heat-flow and guarded-heater methods agree on module efficiency up to 70 K temperature difference, while the AC Harman method underestimates efficiency by about 30% due to radiative losses and boundary-condition effects.