Vision-language models perform only marginally above random on action quality assessment and retain systematic biases even after targeted prompting and contrastive reformulation.
A decade of action quality assessment: Largest systematic survey of trends, challenges, and future directions.International Journal of Computer Vi- sion, 134:73
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CV 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Can Vision Language Models Judge Action Quality? An Empirical Evaluation
Vision-language models perform only marginally above random on action quality assessment and retain systematic biases even after targeted prompting and contrastive reformulation.