Empirical comparison across 14 retrievers on the BRIGHT benchmark shows reasoning-specialized models can match strong accuracy with competitive speed while many large LLM bi-encoders add latency for small gains and confidence scores remain poorly calibrated.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.IR 2years
2026 2roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
A re-ranking system for rich-media search that plans query intents from sessions, adds visual signals from VLMs, and uses an LLM to score results on multiple facets before multi-task RL adaptation, with reported gains in engagement after industrial deployment.
citing papers explorer
-
Are LLM-Based Retrievers Worth Their Cost? An Empirical Study of Efficiency, Robustness, and Reasoning Overhead
Empirical comparison across 14 retrievers on the BRIGHT benchmark shows reasoning-specialized models can match strong accuracy with competitive speed while many large LLM bi-encoders add latency for small gains and confidence scores remain poorly calibrated.