Corrected empirical limits show the most massive galaxies never exceed the theoretical baryonic maximum of 0.16 times halo virial mass, keeping observations consistent with LambdaCDM at all redshifts.
The universality of the virial halo mass function and models for non-universality of other halo definitions
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
abstract
The abundance of galaxy clusters can constrain both the geometry and growth of structure in our Universe. However, this probe could be significantly complicated by recent claims of nonuniversality -- non-trivial dependences with respect to the cosmological model and redshift. In this work we analyse the dependance of the mass function on the way haloes are identified and establish if this can cause departures from universality. In order to explore this dependance, we use a set of different N-body cosmological simulations (Le SBARBINE simulations), with the latest cosmological parameters from the Planck collaboration; this first suite of simulations is followed by a lower resolution set, carried out with different cosmological parameters. We identify dark matter haloes using a Spherical Overdensity algorithm with varying overdensity thresholds (virial, 2000rho_c, 1000rho_c, 500rho_c, 200rho_c and 200rho_b) at all redshifts. We notice that, when expressed in term of the rescaled variable nu, the mass functionfor virial haloes is a nearly universal as a function of redshift and cosmology, while this is clearly not the case for the other overdensities we considered. We provide fitting functions for the halo mass function parameters as a function of overdensity, that allow to predict, to within a few percent accuracy, the halo mass function for a wide range of halo definitions, redshifts and cosmological models. We then show how the departures from universality associated with other halo definitions can be derived by combining the universality of the virial definition with the expected shape of the density profile of halos.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
The paper defines interpretability as model structural transparency and explainability as scientific content mapping, discusses their trade-offs, and frames both as deliberate modeling choices for ML in physics.
citing papers explorer
-
Empirical estimates of how massive galaxies can be in {\Lambda}CDM
Corrected empirical limits show the most massive galaxies never exceed the theoretical baryonic maximum of 0.16 times halo virial mass, keeping observations consistent with LambdaCDM at all redshifts.
-
Interpreting "Interpretability" and Explaining "Explainability" in Machine Learning in Physics
The paper defines interpretability as model structural transparency and explainability as scientific content mapping, discusses their trade-offs, and frames both as deliberate modeling choices for ML in physics.