WhatIf provides an interactive platform for real-time exploration of LLM-driven social simulations, enabling policymakers to iteratively test plans, reflect on assumptions, and uncover vulnerabilities in emergency preparedness scenarios.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
IntervenSim is an intervention-aware social network simulation that couples source interventions with crowd interactions in a feedback loop, improving MAPE by 41.6% and DTW by 66.9% over prior static frameworks on real-world events.
PGHS fuses policy-guided LLM reasoning and ML fitting to simulate group user behavior with 8.8% error on Meituan data from 101 merchants and 26k trajectories, beating pure reasoning and fitting baselines by 45.8% and 40.9%.
Role-based personas in multi-agent LLM systems suppress payoff-aligned behavior, shifting equilibrium selection by up to 90 percentage points in Tragedy of the Commons versus Green Transition scenarios even with full payoff information.
citing papers explorer
-
WhatIf: Interactive Exploration of LLM-Powered Social Simulations for Policy Reasoning
WhatIf provides an interactive platform for real-time exploration of LLM-driven social simulations, enabling policymakers to iteratively test plans, reflect on assumptions, and uncover vulnerabilities in emergency preparedness scenarios.
-
IntervenSim: Intervention-Aware Social Network Simulation for Opinion Dynamics
IntervenSim is an intervention-aware social network simulation that couples source interventions with crowd interactions in a feedback loop, improving MAPE by 41.6% and DTW by 66.9% over prior static frameworks on real-world events.
-
Meituan Merchant Business Diagnosis via Policy-Guided Dual-Process User Simulation
PGHS fuses policy-guided LLM reasoning and ML fitting to simulate group user behavior with 8.8% error on Meituan data from 101 merchants and 26k trajectories, beating pure reasoning and fitting baselines by 45.8% and 40.9%.
-
When Identity Overrides Incentives: Representational Choices as Governance Decisions in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Role-based personas in multi-agent LLM systems suppress payoff-aligned behavior, shifting equilibrium selection by up to 90 percentage points in Tragedy of the Commons versus Green Transition scenarios even with full payoff information.