Systematic review of thirteen malicious-code prompt corpora for coding LLM refusal evaluation that catalogs construction methods, surfaces gaps in human baselines, cross-corpus comparability, and malware taxonomies, and proposes methodological improvements.
RMCBench: Benchmarking large language models’ resistance to malicious code
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CR 2years
2026 2verdicts
ACCEPT 2representative citing papers
The paper releases a 1,554-prompt consensus-labeled bank separating executable malicious code requests from security knowledge requests, validated by five-model majority labeling with Fleiss' kappa of 0.876.
citing papers explorer
-
Refusal Evaluation in Coding LLMs and Code Agents: A Systematic Review of Thirteen Malicious-Code Prompt Corpora (2023-2025)
Systematic review of thirteen malicious-code prompt corpora for coding LLM refusal evaluation that catalogs construction methods, surfaces gaps in human baselines, cross-corpus comparability, and malware taxonomies, and proposes methodological improvements.
-
A Validated Prompt Bank for Malicious Code Generation: Separating Executable Weapons from Security Knowledge in 1,554 Consensus-Labeled Prompts
The paper releases a 1,554-prompt consensus-labeled bank separating executable malicious code requests from security knowledge requests, validated by five-model majority labeling with Fleiss' kappa of 0.876.