pith. sign in

arxiv: 1202.0633 · v1 · pith:5GV2XI4Rnew · submitted 2012-02-03 · 📊 stat.ME

Frasian Inference

classification 📊 stat.ME
keywords casesdiscussaccountagreementagreementsarxivattentionbayes
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Don Fraser has given an interesting account of the agreements and disagreements between Bayesian posterior probabilities and confidence levels. In this comment I discuss some cases where the lack of such agreement is extreme. I then discuss a few cases where it is possible to have Bayes procedures with frequentist validity. Such frequentist-Bayesian---or Frasian---methods deserve more attention [arXiv:1112.5582].

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.