Remarks on common hypercyclic vectors
read the original abstract
We treat the question of existence of common hypercyclic vectors for families of continuous linear operators. It is shown that for any continuous linear operator $T$ on a complex Fr\'echet space $X$ and a set $\Lambda\subseteq \R_+\times\C$ which is not of zero three-dimensional Lebesgue measure, the family $\{aT+bI:(a,b)\in\Lambda\}$ has no common hypercyclic vectors. This allows to answer negatively questions raised by Godefroy and Shapiro and by Aron. We also prove a sufficient condition for a family of scalar multiples of a given operator on a complex Fr\'echet space to have a common hypercyclic vector. It allows to show that if $\D=\{z\in\C:|z|<1\}$ and $\phi\in \H^\infty(\D)$ is non-constant, then the family $\{zM_\phi^\star:b^{-1}<|z|<a^{-1}\}$ has a common hypercyclic vector, where $M_\phi:\H^2(\D)\to \H^2(\D)$, $M_\phi f=\phi f$, $a=\inf\{|\phi(z)|:z\in\D\}$ and $b=\sup\{|\phi(z)|:|z|\in\D\}$, providing an affirmative answer to a question by Bayart and Grivaux. Finally, extending a result of Costakis and Sambarino, we prove that the family $\{aT_b:a,b\in\C\setminus\{0\}\}$ has a common hypercyclic vector, where $T_bf(z)=f(z-b)$ acts on the Fr\'echet space $\H(\C)$ of entire functions on one complex variable.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.