pith. sign in

arxiv: 1312.4261 · v1 · pith:XTQI66W2new · submitted 2013-12-16 · ⚛️ physics.geo-ph · astro-ph.EP

Comparison of CPO and FCN empirical models

classification ⚛️ physics.geo-ph astro-ph.EP
keywords modelsaccuracyauthoravailablecelestialcomparedcomparisoncore
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this presentation, several publicly available empiric models of the celestial pole offset (CPO) and free core nutation (FCN), included those developed by the author, are investigated and compared each other from different points of view, such as representation of the observation data, FCN parameters variation, prediction accuracy. Based on this study, some practical recommendations are proposed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.