pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1802.01505 · v3 · submitted 2018-02-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

H₀ from cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae, with Gaussian Processes and the novel Weighted Polynomial Regression method

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords datamethodgaussianhubbleprovidedsniaanalysischronometers
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we present new constraints on the Hubble parameter $H_0$ using: (i) the available data on $H(z)$ obtained from cosmic chronometers (CCH); (ii) the Hubble rate data points extracted from the supernovae of Type Ia (SnIa) of the Pantheon compilation and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) CANDELS and CLASH Multy-Cycle Treasury (MCT) programs; and (iii) the local HST measurement of $H_0$ provided by Riess et al. (2018), $H_0^{{\rm HST}}=(73.45\pm1.66)$ km/s/Mpc. Various determinations of $H_0$ using the Gaussian processes (GPs) method and the most updated list of CCH data have been recently provided by Yu, Ratra and Wang (2018). Using the Gaussian kernel they find $H_0=(67.42\pm 4.75)$ km/s/Mpc. Here we extend their analysis to also include the most released and complete set of SnIa data, which allows us to reduce the uncertainty by a factor $\sim 3$ with respect to the result found by only considering the CCH information. We obtain $H_0=(67.06\pm 1.68)$ km/s/Mpc, which favors again the lower range of values for $H_0$ and is in tension with $H_0^{{\rm HST}}$. The tension reaches the $2.71\sigma$ level. We round off the GPs determination too by taking also into account the error propagation of the kernel hyperparameters when the CCH with and without $H_0^{{\rm HST}}$ are used in the analysis. In addition, we present a novel method to reconstruct functions from data, which consists in a weighted sum of polynomial regressions (WPR). We apply it from a cosmographic perspective to reconstruct $H(z)$ and estimate $H_0$ from CCH and SnIa measurements. The result obtained with this method, $H_0=(68.90\pm 1.96)$ km/s/Mpc, is fully compatible with the GPs ones. Finally, a more conservative GPs+WPR value is also provided, $H_0=(68.45\pm 2.00)$ km/s/Mpc, which is still almost $2\sigma$ away from $H_0^{{\rm HST}}$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Model-independent reconstruction finds 96.7-98.5% probability of phantom crossing if recombination is standard, but early new physics to ease Hubble tension weakens this preference while requiring unrealistically high...

  2. Probing the sensitivity of dark energy dynamics to equation of state parametrization flexibility

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    Flexible dark energy equation of state parametrizations mildly favor dynamical phantom-like behavior at z~1-2, but the preference is only ~2 sigma and sensitive to the model form and extrapolation.

  3. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2018-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Final Planck CMB data confirms the flat 6-parameter ΛCDM model with Ω_c h² = 0.120 ± 0.001, Ω_b h² = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004, τ = 0.054 ± 0.007, H_0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc, and no strong evidence for extensions.