pith. sign in

arxiv: 1805.00065 · v3 · pith:IVBTAFQGnew · submitted 2018-04-30 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.LG

A General Framework for Counterfactual Learning-to-Rank

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.LG
keywords deeppropdcgrankingcounterfactualgenerallearning-to-rankbiasbroad
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Implicit feedback (e.g., click, dwell time) is an attractive source of training data for Learning-to-Rank, but its naive use leads to learning results that are distorted by presentation bias. For the special case of optimizing average rank for linear ranking functions, however, the recently developed SVM-PropRank method has shown that counterfactual inference techniques can be used to provably overcome the distorting effect of presentation bias. Going beyond this special case, this paper provides a general and theoretically rigorous framework for counterfactual learning-to-rank that enables unbiased training for a broad class of additive ranking metrics (e.g., Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG)) as well as a broad class of models (e.g., deep networks). Specifically, we derive a relaxation for propensity-weighted rank-based metrics which is subdifferentiable and thus suitable for gradient-based optimization. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this general approach by instantiating two new learning methods. One is a new type of unbiased SVM that optimizes DCG -- called SVM PropDCG --, and we show how the resulting optimization problem can be solved via the Convex Concave Procedure (CCP). The other is Deep PropDCG, where the ranking function can be an arbitrary deep network. In addition to the theoretical support, we empirically find that SVM PropDCG significantly outperforms existing linear rankers in terms of DCG. Moreover, the ability to train non-linear ranking functions via Deep PropDCG further improves performance.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. To Model or to Intervene: A Comparison of Counterfactual and Online Learning to Rank from User Interactions

    cs.IR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First direct comparison finds counterfactual LTR best with low bias or noise but potentially harmful otherwise, while online LTR is robust yet requires ranking control.