pith. sign in

arxiv: 1909.05286 · v1 · pith:T2F3TPBNnew · submitted 2019-09-11 · 💻 cs.CL

Frustratingly Easy Natural Question Answering

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords algorithmicansweringaugmentationbenchmarkdataensemblinglikenatural
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Existing literature on Question Answering (QA) mostly focuses on algorithmic novelty, data augmentation, or increasingly large pre-trained language models like XLNet and RoBERTa. Additionally, a lot of systems on the QA leaderboards do not have associated research documentation in order to successfully replicate their experiments. In this paper, we outline these algorithmic components such as Attention-over-Attention, coupled with data augmentation and ensembling strategies that have shown to yield state-of-the-art results on benchmark datasets like SQuAD, even achieving super-human performance. Contrary to these prior results, when we evaluate on the recently proposed Natural Questions benchmark dataset, we find that an incredibly simple approach of transfer learning from BERT outperforms the previous state-of-the-art system trained on 4 million more examples than ours by 1.9 F1 points. Adding ensembling strategies further improves that number by 2.3 F1 points.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?

    cs.CL 2020-02 accept novelty 6.0

    Fine-tuned language models store knowledge in parameters to answer questions competitively with retrieval-based open-domain QA systems.