Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.06647 v2 pith:BMQ7MIGX submitted 2019-11-15 cs.DM cs.ITmath.IT

Optimal adaptive group testing

classification cs.DM cs.ITmath.IT
keywords testinggroupindividualsalgorithminfectednumberresultsstage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The group testing problem is concerned with identifying a small number $k \sim n^\theta$ for $\theta \in (0,1)$ of infected individuals in a large population of size $n$. At our disposal is a testing procedure that allows us to test groups of individuals. This paper considers two-stage designs where the test results of the first stage can inform the design of the second stage. We are interested in the minimum number of tests to recover the set of infected individuals w.h.p. Equipped with a novel algorithm for one-stage group testing from [Coja-Oghlan, Gebhard, Hahn-Klimroth \& Loick 2019], we propose a polynomial-time two-stage algorithm that matches the universal information-theoretic lower bound of group testing. This result improves on results from [M\'ezard \& Toninelli 2011] and resolves open problems prominently posed in [Aldridge, Johnson \& Scarlett 2019, Berger \& Levenshtein 2002, Damaschke \& Muhammad 2012].

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.