pith. sign in

arxiv: 2101.01144 · v2 · pith:C7V77K3Enew · submitted 2021-01-04 · 💰 econ.EM

Shoiuld Humans Lie to Machines: The Incentive Compatibility of Lasso and General Weighted Lasso

classification 💰 econ.EM
keywords lassoincentivecompatibilityresultsuserweightedaboveachieved
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider situations where a user feeds her attributes to a machine learning method that tries to predict her best option based on a random sample of other users. The predictor is incentive-compatible if the user has no incentive to misreport her covariates. Focusing on the popular Lasso estimation technique, we borrow tools from high-dimensional statistics to characterize sufficient conditions that ensure that Lasso is incentive compatible in large samples. We extend our results to the Conservative Lasso estimator and provide new moment bounds for this generalized weighted version of Lasso. Our results show that incentive compatibility is achieved if the tuning parameter is kept above some threshold. We present simulations that illustrate how this can be done in practice.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.