REVIEW 2 cited by
Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning
read the original abstract
Marginal-likelihood based model-selection, even though promising, is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Instead, most approaches rely on validation data, which may not be readily available. In this work, we present a scalable marginal-likelihood estimation method to select both hyperparameters and network architectures, based on the training data alone. Some hyperparameters can be estimated online during training, simplifying the procedure. Our marginal-likelihood estimate is based on Laplace's method and Gauss-Newton approximations to the Hessian, and it outperforms cross-validation and manual-tuning on standard regression and image classification datasets, especially in terms of calibration and out-of-distribution detection. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable (e.g., in nonstationary settings).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Self-Supervised Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification
SSLA approximates the posterior predictive distribution by refitting Bayesian models on self-predicted data, providing a sampling-free method that improves predictive calibration over classical Laplace approximations ...
-
Self-Supervised Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification
SSLA approximates the posterior predictive distribution by refitting Bayesian models on self-predicted data, yielding a deterministic uncertainty measure that outperforms standard Laplace approximations in calibration...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.