A Framework for Cluster and Classifier Evaluation in the Absence of Reference Labels
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:WNDIRTJVrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
In some problem spaces, the high cost of obtaining ground truth labels necessitates use of lower quality reference datasets. It is difficult to benchmark model performance using these datasets, as evaluation results may be biased. We propose a supplement to using reference labels, which we call an approximate ground truth refinement (AGTR). Using an AGTR, we prove that bounds on specific metrics used to evaluate clustering algorithms and multi-class classifiers can be computed without reference labels. We also introduce a procedure that uses an AGTR to identify inaccurate evaluation results produced from datasets of dubious quality. Creating an AGTR requires domain knowledge, and malware family classification is a task with robust domain knowledge approaches that support the construction of an AGTR. We demonstrate our AGTR evaluation framework by applying it to a popular malware labeling tool to diagnose over-fitting in prior testing and evaluate changes whose impact could not be meaningfully quantified under previous data.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cybersecurity is the True Frontier for Generative AI Success or Failure
Cybersecurity's scale, adversaries, labeling issues, and operational demands make it the superior test-case for general AI progress over NLP or computer vision.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.