The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2110.04369 · v1 · pith:5WN2PBZM · submitted 2021-10-08 · cs.LG · cs.AI

A Loss Curvature Perspective on Training Instability in Deep Learning

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5WN2PBZMrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords traininglearninglosscurvatureperspectiveratechoicesconditioning
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the evolution of the loss Hessian across many classification tasks in order to understand the effect the curvature of the loss has on the training dynamics. Whereas prior work has focused on how different learning rates affect the loss Hessian observed during training, we also analyze the effects of model initialization, architectural choices, and common training heuristics such as gradient clipping and learning rate warmup. Our results demonstrate that successful model and hyperparameter choices allow the early optimization trajectory to either avoid -- or navigate out of -- regions of high curvature and into flatter regions that tolerate a higher learning rate. Our results suggest a unifying perspective on how disparate mitigation strategies for training instability ultimately address the same underlying failure mode of neural network optimization, namely poor conditioning. Inspired by the conditioning perspective, we show that learning rate warmup can improve training stability just as much as batch normalization, layer normalization, MetaInit, GradInit, and Fixup initialization.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluation-Strategy Gap in Fault Diagnosis of Deep Learning Programs

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using a corpus of 5542 fault-injected traces from 38 DL programs, the study finds a 0.19 balanced accuracy gap in fault diagnosis between within-program and cross-program evaluation caused by program-specific feature ...