Evaluating User Perception of Speech Recognition System Quality with Semantic Distance Metric
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BZ2INJ6Hrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Measuring automatic speech recognition (ASR) system quality is critical for creating user-satisfying voice-driven applications. Word Error Rate (WER) has been traditionally used to evaluate ASR system quality; however, it sometimes correlates poorly with user perception/judgement of transcription quality. This is because WER weighs every word equally and does not consider semantic correctness which has a higher impact on user perception. In this work, we propose evaluating ASR output hypotheses quality with SemDist that can measure semantic correctness by using the distance between the semantic vectors of the reference and hypothesis extracted from a pre-trained language model. Our experimental results of 71K and 36K user annotated ASR output quality show that SemDist achieves higher correlation with user perception than WER. We also show that SemDist has higher correlation with downstream Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks than WER.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Qualitative Evaluation of Language Model Rescoring in Automatic Speech Recognition
Introduces POSER and EmbER metrics to assess grammatical and semantic contributions of language model rescoring in ASR systems.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.