The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2203.12171 · v1 · pith:V6SLSIR3 · submitted 2022-03-23 · cs.CL

An Empirical Study of Memorization in NLP

Reviewed by Pithpith:V6SLSIR3open to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords trainingmemorizationinstancesattributionempiricallyinstancelong-tailmemorized
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A recent study by Feldman (2020) proposed a long-tail theory to explain the memorization behavior of deep learning models. However, memorization has not been empirically verified in the context of NLP, a gap addressed by this work. In this paper, we use three different NLP tasks to check if the long-tail theory holds. Our experiments demonstrate that top-ranked memorized training instances are likely atypical, and removing the top-memorized training instances leads to a more serious drop in test accuracy compared with removing training instances randomly. Furthermore, we develop an attribution method to better understand why a training instance is memorized. We empirically show that our memorization attribution method is faithful, and share our interesting finding that the top-memorized parts of a training instance tend to be features negatively correlated with the class label.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.