The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2204.00290 · v1 · pith:D5YLK67X · submitted 2022-04-01 · cs.CL · cs.LG

Predicting Intervention Approval in Clinical Trials through Multi-Document Summarization

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:D5YLK67Xrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords interventioneffectivenessclinicalmethodtrialsabstractsarticlesevidence
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Clinical trials offer a fundamental opportunity to discover new treatments and advance the medical knowledge. However, the uncertainty of the outcome of a trial can lead to unforeseen costs and setbacks. In this study, we propose a new method to predict the effectiveness of an intervention in a clinical trial. Our method relies on generating an informative summary from multiple documents available in the literature about the intervention under study. Specifically, our method first gathers all the abstracts of PubMed articles related to the intervention. Then, an evidence sentence, which conveys information about the effectiveness of the intervention, is extracted automatically from each abstract. Based on the set of evidence sentences extracted from the abstracts, a short summary about the intervention is constructed. Finally, the produced summaries are used to train a BERT-based classifier, in order to infer the effectiveness of an intervention. To evaluate our proposed method, we introduce a new dataset which is a collection of clinical trials together with their associated PubMed articles. Our experiments, demonstrate the effectiveness of producing short informative summaries and using them to predict the effectiveness of an intervention.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.