The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2204.08832 · v1 · pith:ODTCHLR2 · submitted 2022-04-19 · cs.CL

Impact of Tokenization on Language Models: An Analysis for Turkish

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ODTCHLR2record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords tokenizersmodelsfactolanguageperformancetokenizationdifferentimpact
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Tokenization is an important text preprocessing step to prepare input tokens for deep language models. WordPiece and BPE are de facto methods employed by important models, such as BERT and GPT. However, the impact of tokenization can be different for morphologically rich languages, such as Turkic languages, where many words can be generated by adding prefixes and suffixes. We compare five tokenizers at different granularity levels, i.e. their outputs vary from smallest pieces of characters to the surface form of words, including a Morphological-level tokenizer. We train these tokenizers and pretrain medium-sized language models using RoBERTa pretraining procedure on the Turkish split of the OSCAR corpus. We then fine-tune our models on six downstream tasks. Our experiments, supported by statistical tests, reveal that Morphological-level tokenizer has challenging performance with de facto tokenizers. Furthermore, we find that increasing the vocabulary size improves the performance of Morphological and Word-level tokenizers more than that of de facto tokenizers. The ratio of the number of vocabulary parameters to the total number of model parameters can be empirically chosen as 20% for de facto tokenizers and 40% for other tokenizers to obtain a reasonable trade-off between model size and performance.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Plausibility as Commonsense Reasoning: Humans Succeed, Large Language Models Do not

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Humans reliably shift attachment preferences based on event plausibility in Turkish RC ambiguities, but Turkish and multilingual LLMs exhibit weak, unstable, or reversed shifts under the same conditions.