The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2206.06317 · v1 · pith:Y52BVOGG · submitted 2022-06-13 · cs.LG · cs.AI

Learning Uncertainty with Artificial Neural Networks for Improved Predictive Process Monitoring

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Y52BVOGGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords uncertaintynetworkspredictionsneuralprocessaccurateartificialconfidence
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The inability of artificial neural networks to assess the uncertainty of their predictions is an impediment to their widespread use. We distinguish two types of learnable uncertainty: model uncertainty due to a lack of training data and noise-induced observational uncertainty. Bayesian neural networks use solid mathematical foundations to learn the model uncertainties of their predictions. The observational uncertainty can be calculated by adding one layer to these networks and augmenting their loss functions. Our contribution is to apply these uncertainty concepts to predictive process monitoring tasks to train uncertainty-based models to predict the remaining time and outcomes. Our experiments show that uncertainty estimates allow more and less accurate predictions to be differentiated and confidence intervals to be constructed in both regression and classification tasks. These conclusions remain true even in early stages of running processes. Moreover, the deployed techniques are fast and produce more accurate predictions. The learned uncertainty could increase users' confidence in their process prediction systems, promote better cooperation between humans and these systems, and enable earlier implementations with smaller datasets.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.