REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Intercultural Affect Recognition: Audio-Visual Affect Recognition in the Wild Across Six Cultures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In our multicultural world, affect-aware AI systems that support humans need the ability to perceive affect across variations in emotion expression patterns across cultures. These systems must perform well in cultural contexts without annotated affect datasets available for training models. A standard assumption in affective computing is that affect recognition models trained and used within the same culture (intracultural) will perform better than models trained on one culture and used on different cultures (intercultural). We test this assumption and present the first systematic study of intercultural affect recognition models using videos of real-world dyadic interactions from six cultures. We develop an attention-based feature selection approach under temporal causal discovery to identify behavioral cues that can be leveraged in intercultural affect recognition models. Across all six cultures, our findings demonstrate that intercultural affect recognition models were as effective or more effective than intracultural models. We identify and contribute useful behavioral features for intercultural affect recognition; facial features from the visual modality were more useful than the audio modality in this study's context. Our paper presents a proof-of-concept and motivation for the future development of intercultural affect recognition systems, especially those deployed in low-resource situations without annotated data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Feeling Machines: Ethics, Culture, and the Rise of Emotional AI
A Spring School position paper argues that emotionally responsive AI brings benefits and risks, and offers ten recommendations on transparency, certification, cultural adaptation, human oversight, and longitudinal research.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.