The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2209.14795 · v1 · pith:VNORCPFS · submitted 2022-09-29 · cs.CR

ThreatPro: Multi-Layer Threat Analysis in the Cloud

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:VNORCPFSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CR
keywords cloudanalysismulti-layerthreatthreatprodynamicthreatsacross
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Many effective Threat Analysis (TA) techniques exist that focus on analyzing threats to targeted assets (e.g., components, services). These techniques consider static interconnections among the assets. However, in dynamic environments, such as the Cloud, resources can instantiate, migrate across physical hosts, or decommission to provide rapid resource elasticity to the users. It is evident that existing TA techniques cannot address all these requirements. In addition, there is an increasing number of complex multi-layer/multi-asset attacks on Cloud systems, such as the Equifax data breach. Hence, there is a need for threat analysis approaches that are designed to analyze threats in complex, dynamic, and multi-layer Cloud environments. In this paper, we propose ThreatPro that addresses the analysis of multi-layer attacks and supports dynamic interconnections in the Cloud. ThreatPro facilitates threat analysis by developing a technology-agnostic information flow model, which represents the Cloud's functionality through a set of conditional transitions. The model establishes the basis to capture the multi-layer and dynamic interconnections during the life-cycle of a Virtual Machine (VM). Specifically, ThreatPro contributes in (a) enabling the exploration of a threat's behavior and its propagation across the Cloud, and (b) assessing the security of the Cloud by analyzing the impact of multiple threats across various operational layers/assets. Using public information on threats from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), we validate ThreatPro's capabilities, i.e., (a) identify and trace actual Cloud attacks and (b) speculatively postulate alternate potential attack paths.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.