The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2211.05513 · v2 · pith:WR5BPUDH · submitted 2022-11-10 · cs.IT · math.IT

Coding Schemes Based on Reed-Muller Codes for (d,infty)-RLL Input-Constrained Channels

Reviewed by Pithpith:WR5BPUDHopen to challenge →

classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords inftycodesratesubcodeslinearcodingupperbounds
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The paper considers coding schemes derived from Reed-Muller (RM) codes, for transmission over input-constrained memoryless channels. Our focus is on the $(d,\infty)$-runlength limited (RLL) constraint, which mandates that any pair of successive $1$s be separated by at least $d$ $0$s. In our study, we first consider $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes of RM codes, taking the coordinates of the RM codes to be in the standard lexicographic ordering. We show, via a simple construction, that RM codes of rate $R$ have linear $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes of rate $R\cdot{2^{-\left \lceil \log_2(d+1)\right \rceil}}$. We then show that our construction is essentially rate-optimal, by deriving an upper bound on the rates of linear $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes of RM codes of rate $R$. Next, for the special case when $d=1$, we prove the existence of potentially non-linear $(1,\infty)$-RLL subcodes that achieve a rate of $\max\left(0,R-\frac38\right)$. This, for $R > 3/4$, beats the $R/2$ rate obtainable from linear subcodes. We further derive upper bounds on the rates of $(1,\infty)$-RLL subcodes, not necessarily linear, of a certain canonical sequence of RM codes of rate $R$. We then shift our attention to settings where the coordinates of the RM code are not ordered according to the lexicographic ordering, and derive rate upper bounds for linear $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes in these cases as well. Finally, we present a new two-stage constrained coding scheme, again using RM codes of rate $R$, which outperforms any linear coding scheme using $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes, for values of $R$ close to $1$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.