Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards a Flexible User Interface for 'Quick and Dirty' Learning Analytics Indicator Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.01711 v1 pith:GJZSIXYX submitted 2023-04-04 cs.CY cs.HC

classification cs.CYcs.HC
keywords designindicatorsanalyticsindicatorlearninguserapproachco-design
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Research on Human-Centered Learning Analytics (HCLA) has provided demonstrations of a successful co-design process for LA tools with different stakeholders. However, there is a need for 'quick and dirty' methods to allow the low-cost design of LA indicators. Recently, Indicator Specification Cards (ISC) have been proposed to help different learning analytics stakeholders co-design indicators in a systematic manner. In this paper, we aim at improving the user experience, flexibility, and reliability of the ISC-based indicator design process. To this end, we present the development details of an intuitive and theoretically-sound ISC user interface that allows the low-cost design of LA indicators. Further, we propose two approaches to support the flexible design of indicators, namely a task-driven approach and a data-driven approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools