M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability to generate fluent responses to a wide variety of user queries. However, this has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, education, and academia. In this study, we strive to create automated systems that can detect machine-generated texts and pinpoint potential misuse. We first introduce a large-scale benchmark \textbf{M4}, which is a multi-generator, multi-domain, and multi-lingual corpus for machine-generated text detection. Through an extensive empirical study of this dataset, we show that it is challenging for detectors to generalize well on instances from unseen domains or LLMs. In such cases, detectors tend to misclassify machine-generated text as human-written. These results show that the problem is far from solved and that there is a lot of room for improvement. We believe that our dataset will enable future research towards more robust approaches to this pressing societal problem. The dataset is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/M4.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLM Agents Make Collective Belief Dynamics Programmable: Challenges and Research Directions
LLM agents make collective belief dynamics programmable, with simulations showing coordinated agents induce stable belief shifts, and four structural properties that complicate detection and defense.
-
Explainable Disentangled Representation Learning for Generalizable Authorship Attribution in the Era of Generative AI
EAVAE disentangles style from content via contrastive pretraining and an explainable discriminator in a VAE setup, claiming SOTA authorship attribution on multiple datasets and strong few-shot AI text detection.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.