Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learning
Reviewed by Pithpith:TYNWPCHVopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
In-context learning (ICL), the ability of large language models to perform novel tasks by conditioning on a prompt with a few task examples, requires these examples to be informative about the test instance. The standard approach of independently ranking and selecting the most similar examples selects redundant examples while omitting important information. In this work, we show that BERTScore-Recall (BSR) selects better examples that demonstrate more of the salient aspects, e.g. reasoning patterns, of the test input. We further extend BSR and many standard metrics to easily optimizable set-level metrics, giving still better coverage of those salient aspects. On 15 datasets spanning 6 tasks and with 7 diverse LLMs, we show that (1) BSR is the superior metric for in-context example selection across the board, and (2) for compositional tasks, set selection using Set-BSR outperforms independent ranking by up to 17 points on average and, despite being training-free, surpasses methods that leverage task or LLM-specific training.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
UCS: Estimating Unseen Coverage for Improved In-Context Learning
UCS estimates the number of unrevealed latent clusters in candidate demonstration sets via Smoothed Good-Turing on embeddings to improve ICL performance by 2-6% when added to baselines.
-
GRAIN: Group Aggregation via Min-Norm Objective
GRAIN is a gradient aggregation method using min-norm objectives to ensure non-negative inner products with group gradients, yielding tighter uniform stability bounds than SGD under smoothness assumptions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.