Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Ages and Metallicities of the Globular Clusters in the Sparkler

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.11814 v1 pith:43T3JUIR submitted 2023-06-20 astro-ph.GA

The Ages and Metallicities of the Globular Clusters in the Sparkler

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords agesmetallicitiessparklerconsistentgrouppopulationdifferentgalaxy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

JWST observations of the strongly lensed galaxy The Sparkler have revealed a population of gravitationally bound globular cluster (GC) candidates. Different analyses have resulted in broadly similar ages but significantly different metallicities, questioning the assembly history that has led to the formation of such a population. In this letter, we re-analyse the two sets of photometry available in the literature with the code MCMAME especially tailored to fit physical properties of GCs. We find the ages and metallicities from both datasets are consistent within 1 $\sigma$ uncertainties. A significant group of GCs is consistent with being old and metal poor ([Fe/H] $\sim -1.7$). For this group, the ages do not converge, hence, we conclude that they are definitively older than 1 Gyr and can be as old as the age of the Universe. The remaining GCs have younger ages and a metallicity spread. The ages and metallicities distribution of GCs in the Sparkler are consistent with those observed in Local Group's galaxies at similar lookback times. Comparing with predictions from E-MOSAICS simulations we confirm that the Sparkler GC population traces the self-enrichment history of a galaxy which might become a few times $10^9$ M$_{\odot}$ massive system at redshift $z = 0$

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.