The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2307.10569 · v2 · pith:ULNIQ5YU · submitted 2023-07-20 · cs.LG · cs.AI

Deceptive Alignment Monitoring

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ULNIQ5YUrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords alignmentdeceptivelearningmachinemodelsmonitoringdirectionsemerging
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As the capabilities of large machine learning models continue to grow, and as the autonomy afforded to such models continues to expand, the spectre of a new adversary looms: the models themselves. The threat that a model might behave in a seemingly reasonable manner, while secretly and subtly modifying its behavior for ulterior reasons is often referred to as deceptive alignment in the AI Safety & Alignment communities. Consequently, we call this new direction Deceptive Alignment Monitoring. In this work, we identify emerging directions in diverse machine learning subfields that we believe will become increasingly important and intertwined in the near future for deceptive alignment monitoring, and we argue that advances in these fields present both long-term challenges and new research opportunities. We conclude by advocating for greater involvement by the adversarial machine learning community in these emerging directions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fairness of Explanations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Unifying Framework, Axioms, and Future Direction toward Responsible AI

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A conditional invariance framework defines explanation fairness as explanations being statistically independent of protected attributes given task-relevant features, unifying existing metrics and enabling procedural b...