pith. sign in

arxiv: 2308.16902 · v3 · pith:QXPBBYVZnew · submitted 2023-08-31 · 💻 cs.CR

Short Paper: Accountable Safety Implies Finality

classification 💻 cs.CR
keywords accountablefinalityprotocolsafetycertainearlierfractionimplies
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Motivated by proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains such as Ethereum, two key desiderata have recently been studied for Byzantine-fault tolerant (BFT) state-machine replication (SMR) consensus protocols: Finality means that the protocol retains consistency, as long as less than a certain fraction of validators are malicious, even in partially-synchronous environments that allow for temporary violations of assumed network delay bounds. Accountable safety means that in any case of inconsistency, a certain fraction of validators can be identified to have provably violated the protocol. Earlier works have developed impossibility results and protocol constructions for these properties separately. We show that accountable safety implies finality, thereby unifying earlier results.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.