The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2309.12371 · v2 · pith:TOIM6VEF · submitted 2023-09-20 · cs.LG · cs.CY

Fairness Hub Technical Briefs: AUC Gap

Reviewed by Pithpith:TOIM6VEFopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.CY
keywords teamsbiascommondifferentfairnessgoalmeasuremodel
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

To measure bias, we encourage teams to consider using AUC Gap: the absolute difference between the highest and lowest test AUC for subgroups (e.g., gender, race, SES, prior knowledge). It is agnostic to the AI/ML algorithm used and it captures the disparity in model performance for any number of subgroups, which enables non-binary fairness assessments such as for intersectional identity groups. The teams use a wide range of AI/ML models in pursuit of a common goal of doubling math achievement in low-income middle schools. Ensuring that the models, which are trained on datasets collected in many different contexts, do not introduce or amplify biases is important for achieving the goal. We offer here a versatile and easy-to-compute measure of model bias for all the teams in order to create a common benchmark and an analytical basis for sharing what strategies have worked for different teams.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.