Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dynamics of toxic behavior in the Covid-19 vaccination debate

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.06520 v1 pith:M3FPWDET submitted 2023-11-11 cs.SI physics.soc-ph

classification cs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords provaxuserstoxicnovaxactivitybehaviorchangecommunities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the behavior of users on Online Social Networks in the context of Covid-19 vaccines in Italy. We identify two main polarized communities: Provax and Novax. We find that Novax users are more active, more clustered in the network, and share less reliable information compared to the Provax users. On average, Novax are more toxic than Provax. However, starting from June 2021, the Provax became more toxic than the Novax. We show that the change in trend is explained by the aggregation of some contagion effects and the change in the activity level within communities. In fact, we establish that Provax users who increase their intensity of activity after May 2021 are significantly more toxic than the other users, shifting the toxicity up within the Provax community. Our study suggests that users presenting a spiky activity pattern tend to be more toxic.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools