pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.06602 · v2 · pith:NZO2BNT2new · submitted 2023-11-11 · 💻 cs.CL

BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords financialreasoningbenchmarkbizbenchbusinessllmsmodelsquantitative
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model's financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FinTagging: Benchmarking LLMs for Extracting and Structuring Financial Information

    cs.CL 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FinTagging decomposes XBRL tagging into FinNI extraction and FinCL full-taxonomy linking, showing LLMs handle extraction but struggle with fine-grained concept alignment in zero-shot settings.

  2. CLExEval: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Qualitative Evaluation of LLM Clinical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CLExEval introduces a human-annotated evaluation framework on 40 rare cases that identifies verbosity bias, hidden knowledge paradox, and 68.6% reasoning-to-output mismatch in LLMs while showing LLM-as-a-Judge overest...

  3. FinAcumen: Financial Multimodal Reasoning via Self-Evolving Experience Memory Harness

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FinAcumen introduces selective experience memory that distills prior trajectories into reusable strategies and cautionary rules to improve tool-augmented multimodal financial reasoning.

  4. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MetaGraph uses ontology-guided LLM extraction to build knowledge graphs from 681 papers on GenAI in financial NLP, identifying three distinct phases of development from 2022 to 2025.