pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.07270 · v1 · submitted 2023-11-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· quant-ph

Quantum measurements in fundamental physics: a user's manual

Jacob Beckey , Daniel Carney , Giacomo Marocco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exquant-ph
keywords quantum detectorsdark matter haloscopesgravitational wave detectorsquantum noisesqueezingquantum non-demolitionentanglement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linear quantum detectors in high energy physics experiments can be modeled by deriving signal couplings and computing noise spectra from quantum vacuum and thermal fluctuations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper supplies a systematic theoretical framework for linear quantum detectors used in dark matter cavity haloscopes, gravitational wave detectors, and impulsive mechanical sensors. It demonstrates how to calculate the coupling of signals of interest, derive noise spectra, signal-to-noise ratios, and detection sensitivities using standard quantum optics methods. The work also reviews applications of squeezing, non-demolition measurements, and entanglement to improve search performance. A reader would care because these detectors underpin many current fundamental physics experiments, and a unified treatment clarifies both limits and improvement paths.

Core claim

Linear quantum detectors in modern high energy physics experiments admit a systematic treatment in which signal couplings are derived, noise spectra and signal-to-noise ratios are calculated from quantum vacuum and thermal fluctuations, and advanced techniques such as squeezing, non-demolition measurements, and entanglement can be applied to enhance detection sensitivities.

What carries the argument

The linear response regime of quantum detectors, analyzed via quantum optics to obtain vacuum and thermal noise contributions to signal-to-noise ratios.

If this is right

  • Signal couplings and sensitivities in dark matter haloscopes follow directly from the linear quantum optics model.
  • Gravitational wave detectors can incorporate squeezing and entanglement to reach improved signal-to-noise ratios.
  • Impulsive mechanical sensors admit explicit calculations of thermal and vacuum noise limits.
  • Non-demolition measurements reduce back-action noise in the same class of devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same formalism may guide design choices when scaling detectors to new frequency bands or larger sizes.
  • Hybrid systems combining multiple detector types could use the shared noise treatment to optimize overall search strategies.
  • If real devices exhibit deviations, the framework identifies which additional noise terms must be modeled next.

Load-bearing premise

The detectors operate in the linear response regime where standard quantum vacuum and thermal noise dominate without additional unmodeled systematics.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which measured noise spectra or detection sensitivities for a known signal deviate substantially from the predictions of the quantum optics calculation would falsify the applicability of the treatment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.07270 by Daniel Carney, Giacomo Marocco, Jacob Beckey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: A detailed discussion of the generation of frequency￾dependent squeezed vacuum is beyond the scope of this review. However, we note that proof-of-principle ex￾periments that utilize external filter cavities to achieve frequency-dependent (broadband) squeezed light was demonstrated in [14], and frequency-dependent squeezed light has now been used in Advanced LIGO [130]. B. Quantum non-demolition; back-acti… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We give a systematic theoretical treatment of linear quantum detectors used in modern high energy physics experiments, including dark matter cavity haloscopes, gravitational wave detectors, and impulsive mechanical sensors. We show how to derive the coupling of signals of interest to these devices, and how to calculate noise spectra, signal-to-noise ratios, and detection sensitivities. We emphasize the role of quantum vacuum and thermal noise in these systems. Finally, we review ways in which advanced quantum techniques -- squeezing, non-demolition measurements, and entanglement -- can be or currently are used to enhance these searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a systematic theoretical treatment of linear quantum detectors in high-energy physics experiments, including dark matter cavity haloscopes, gravitational wave detectors, and impulsive mechanical sensors. It derives the coupling of signals of interest to these devices, calculates noise spectra, signal-to-noise ratios, and detection sensitivities while emphasizing the role of quantum vacuum and thermal noise, and reviews advanced quantum techniques such as squeezing, non-demolition measurements, and entanglement for enhancing searches.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the paper serves as a useful user's manual that consolidates standard quantum optics methods for HEP detector applications. This can aid experimental design by clarifying quantum noise limits and the potential benefits of advanced techniques, particularly for researchers seeking to optimize sensitivities in vacuum- or thermal-noise-dominated regimes.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract states the linear-response scope but the introduction could more explicitly cross-reference the sections where this assumption is applied in the derivations for each detector type.
  2. [§4] Notation for noise spectral densities is introduced clearly but would benefit from a consolidated table comparing expressions across the haloscope, GW interferometer, and mechanical sensor cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, their accurate summary of its scope, and their recommendation to accept. The referee's assessment aligns with our intent to provide a consolidated reference on quantum techniques for HEP detectors.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is an expository review deriving couplings, noise spectra, and sensitivities for linear quantum detectors in HEP using standard quantum optics in the explicitly stated linear-response regime with vacuum/thermal noise. All derivations rest on established external formalisms rather than internal fits, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claims remain independent of any reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the central content rests on standard quantum mechanics and linear response theory from the prior literature rather than new postulates; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Detectors operate in the linear response regime
    Invoked for deriving signal couplings to the listed devices.
  • domain assumption Quantum vacuum and thermal noise are the dominant noise sources
    Explicitly emphasized as central to the noise spectra calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5612 in / 1231 out tokens · 21129 ms · 2026-05-24T05:49:24.845173+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Minimal noise in non-quantized gravity

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-quantized gravity models that preserve Galilean invariance and reproduce Newtonian interaction on average require a minimal noise injection to remain non-entangling.

  2. Response of interferometers to the vacuum of quantum gravity

    hep-th 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Standard low-energy quantum gravity via effective graviton QFT predicts interferometer length variations of order the Planck length (~10^{-35} m), with no divergences indicating breakdown.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 176 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    magic beamsplitter

    Heisenberg scaling and the shot noise limit Let us first review how entangled probe states are most commonly described as a resource [24, 25], and how they can be used to beat the simplest kind of SQL. Consider the argument we gave for position estimation of a mirror in an interferometer we gave in Eq. (4), which is some- times called an SQL but more prop...

    work page

  2. [2]

    distributed quantum sensing

    Distributed quantum sensing In the previous example, we looked at the use of en- tangled states of the input fields being sent into a single sensing device. In this section, we turn to an alterna- tive idea, involving sending entangled input states into multiple devices, sometimes referred to as “distributed quantum sensing” [154–157]. To illustrate the b...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Quantum-mechanical limitations in macroscopic experiments and modern experimental technique,

    V. B. Braginskii and I. I. Vorontsov, “Quantum-mechanical limitations in macroscopic experiments and modern experimental technique,” Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 114 (Sept., 1974) 41–53

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer,

    C. M. Caves, “Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer,” Phys. Rev. D 23 (Apr, 1981) 1693–1708

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    LIGO: The laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory,

    LIGO Collaboration, A. Abramovici et al., “LIGO: The laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory,” science 256 no. 5055, (1992) 325–333

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors,

    LIGO Collaboration, G. M. Harry et al., “Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 27 no. 8, (2010) 084006

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Detector configuration of KAGRA–the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,

    KAGRA Collaboration, K. Somiya, “Detector configuration of KAGRA–the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 29 no. 12, (2012) 124007

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Advanced VIRGO: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,

    VIRGO Collaboration, F. Acernese et al., “Advanced VIRGO: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 32 no. 2, (2014) 024001

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    A quantum enhanced search for dark matter axions,

    K. M. Backes, D. A. Palken, S. A. Kenany, B. M. Brubaker, S. Cahn, A. Droster, G. C. Hilton, S. Ghosh, H. Jackson, S. K. Lamoreaux, et al., “A quantum enhanced search for dark matter axions,” Nature 590 no. 7845, (2021) 238–242

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit,

    A. V. Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, “Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (Apr, 2021) 141302

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Quantum nondemolition measurements,

    V. B. Braginsky, Y. I. Vorontsov, and K. S. Thorne, “Quantum nondemolition measurements,” Science 209 no. 4456, (1980) 547–557

    work page 1980

  12. [12]

    Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable josephson metamaterial,

    M. A. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Irwin, G. Hilton, L. Vale, and K. Lehnert, “Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable josephson metamaterial,” Nature Physics 4 no. 12, (2008) 929–931

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory,

    H. Grote, K. Danzmann, K. L. Dooley, R. Schnabel, J. Slutsky, and H. Vahlbruch, “First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (May, 2013) 181101

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light,

    J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari, et al., “Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light,” Nature Photonics 7 no. 8, (2013) 613–619

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Quantum-enhanced Advanced LIGO detectors in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy,

    M. Tse et al., “Quantum-enhanced Advanced LIGO detectors in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (Dec, 2019) 231107

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Frequency-dependent squeezing for advanced ligo,

    L. McCuller et al., “Frequency-dependent squeezing for advanced ligo,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (Apr, 2020) 171102

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation,

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, “Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation,” Physical Review A 31 no. 6, (1985) 3761

    work page 1985

  18. [18]

    On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator. I. Issues of principle,

    C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sandberg, and M. Zimmermann, “On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator. I. Issues of principle,” Reviews of Modern Physics 52 no. 2, (Apr., 1980) 341–392

    work page 1980

  19. [19]

    Introduction to Quantum Noise, Measurement and Amplification

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Introduction to Quantum Noise, Measurement and Amplification,” Reviews of Modern Physics 82 no. 2, (April, 2010) 1155–1208, arXiv:0810.4729

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    Quantum sensing,

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quantum sensing,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (Jul, 2017) 035002

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Gravitational radiation detection with laser interferometry,

    R. X. Adhikari, “Gravitational radiation detection with laser interferometry,” Reviews of Modern Physics 86 no. 1, (2014) 121

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Advanced quantum techniques for future gravitational-wave detectors,

    S. L. Danilishin, F. Y. Khalili, and H. Miao, “Advanced quantum techniques for future gravitational-wave detectors,” Living Reviews in Relativity 22 no. 1, (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Axion Dark Matter,

    C. B. Adams et al., “Axion Dark Matter,” in Snowmass 2021. 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.14923 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,

    D. Antypas et al., “New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,” (2022) , arXiv:2203.14915 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Mandel and E

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical coherence and quantum optics. Cambridge university press, 1995

    work page 1995

  26. [26]

    Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states,

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, “Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states,” Physical Review Letters 72 no. 22, (May, 1994) 3439–3443

    work page 1994

  27. [27]

    Quantum Metrology,

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Quantum Metrology,” Physical Review Letters 96 no. 1, (Jan.,

    work page

  28. [28]

    Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation,

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, “Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53 no. 2, (2020) 023001

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state,

    U. Deli´ c, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuleti´ c, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, “Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state,” Science 367 no. 6480, (2020) 892–895

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space,

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, “Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space,” Nature 595 no. 7867, (2021) 378–382

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Search for composite dark matter with optically levitated sensors,

    F. Monteiro, G. Afek, D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, J. Wang, and D. C. Moore, “Search for composite dark matter with optically levitated sensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 18, (2020) 181102, arXiv:2007.12067 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Optically levitating dielectrics in the quantum regime: Theory and protocols,

    O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pflanzer, M. L. Juan, R. Quidant, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. I. Cirac, “Optically levitating dielectrics in the quantum regime: Theory and protocols,” Physical Review A 83 no. 1, (2011) 013803

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Quantum theory of light interaction with a Lorenz-Mie particle: Optical detection and three-dimensional ground-state cooling,

    P. Maurer, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, and O. Romero-Isart, “Quantum theory of light interaction with a Lorenz-Mie particle: Optical detection and three-dimensional ground-state cooling,” Phys. Rev. A 108 no. 3, (2023) 033714, arXiv:2212.04838 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Acceleration and trapping of particles by 36 radiation pressure,

    A. Ashkin, “Acceleration and trapping of particles by 36 radiation pressure,” Physical review letters 24 no. 4, (1970) 156

    work page 1970

  35. [35]

    An introduction to matched filters,

    G. Turin, “An introduction to matched filters,” IRE transactions on Information theory 6 no. 3, (1960) 311–329

    work page 1960

  36. [36]

    Matched filtering of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Computational cost and template placement,

    B. J. Owen and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Matched filtering of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Computational cost and template placement,” Physical Review D 60 no. 2, (1999) 022002

    work page 1999

  37. [37]

    Backaction-evading impulse measurement with mechanical quantum sensors,

    S. Ghosh, D. Carney, P. Shawhan, and J. M. Taylor, “Backaction-evading impulse measurement with mechanical quantum sensors,” Phys. Rev. A 102 no. 2, (2020) 023525, arXiv:1910.11892 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Analysis of first ligo science data for stochastic gravitational waves,

    B. Abbott, R. Abbott, R. Adhikari, A. Ageev, B. Allen, R. Amin, S. Anderson, W. Anderson, M. Araya, H. Armandula, et al., “Analysis of first ligo science data for stochastic gravitational waves,” Physical Review D 69 no. 12, (2004) 122004

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run,

    L. Scientific, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, V. Adya, C. Affeldt, et al., “Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run,” Physical Review D 100 no. 6, (2019) 061101

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    B. M. Brubaker, First results from the HAYSTAC axion search. PhD thesis, 2017. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/ first-results-haystac-axion-search/docview/ 2017160192/se-2

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Chaudhuri, K.D

    S. Chaudhuri, K. Irwin, P. W. Graham, and J. Mardon, “Optimal Impedance Matching and Quantum Limits of Electromagnetic Axion and Hidden-Photon Dark Matter Searches,” arXiv:1803.01627

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion,

    A. Berlin, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, C. Nantista, J. Neilson, P. Schuster, S. Tantawi, N. Toro, and K. Zhou, “Axion Dark Matter Detection by Superconducting Resonant Frequency Conversion,” JHEP 07 no. 07, (2020) 088, arXiv:1912.11048 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Revisiting the detection rate for axion haloscopes,

    D. Kim, J. Jeong, S. Youn, Y. Kim, and Y. K. Semertzidis, “Revisiting the detection rate for axion haloscopes,” JCAP 03 (2020) 066, arXiv:2001.05605 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Quantum enhanced metrology in the search for fundamental physical phenomena,

    K. W. Lehnert, “Quantum enhanced metrology in the search for fundamental physical phenomena,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes (2022) 40. https: //scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.40

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.40 2022

  45. [45]

    Casella and R

    G. Casella and R. L. Berger, Statistical inference. Cengage Learning, 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Calculations for cosmic axion detection,

    L. Krauss, J. Moody, F. Wilczek, and D. E. Morris, “Calculations for cosmic axion detection,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (Oct, 1985) 1797–1800. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1797

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.1797 1985

  47. [47]

    Cavity Design for a Cosmic Axion Detector,

    C. Hagmann, P. Sikivie, N. Sullivan, D. B. Tanner, and S. I. Cho, “Cavity Design for a Cosmic Axion Detector,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61 (1990) 1076–1085

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    Squeezed vacuum used to accelerate the search for a weak classical signal,

    M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, B. M. Brubaker, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, “Squeezed vacuum used to accelerate the search for a weak classical signal,” Phys. Rev. X 9 (May, 2019) 021023. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021023

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.021023 2019

  49. [49]

    Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers,

    C. M. Caves, “Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers,” Physical Review D 26 no. 8, (Oct., 1982) 1817–1839

    work page 1982

  50. [50]

    Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion,

    P. Sikivie, “Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415–1417. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  51. [51]

    Calculations for Cosmic Axion Detection,

    L. Krauss, J. Moody, F. Wilczek, and D. E. Morris, “Calculations for Cosmic Axion Detection,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 1797

    work page 1985

  52. [52]

    Axion dark matter: How to see it?,

    Y. K. Semertzidis and S. Youn, “Axion dark matter: How to see it?,” Sci. Adv. 8 no. 8, (2022) , arXiv:2104.14831 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Direct detection constraints on dark photon dark matter,

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, “Direct detection constraints on dark photon dark matter,” Physics Letters B 747 (2015) 331–338

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Design overview of dm radio pathfinder experiment,

    M. Silva-Feaver et al., “Design overview of dm radio pathfinder experiment,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 27 no. 4, (2016) 1–4

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Search for invisible axion dark matter with the axion dark matter experiment,

    N. Du, N. Force, R. Khatiwada, E. Lentz, R. Ottens, L. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, G. Carosi, N. Woollett, D. Bowring, et al., “Search for invisible axion dark matter with the axion dark matter experiment,” Physical review letters 120 no. 15, (2018) 151301

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Extended search for the invisible axion with the axion dark matter experiment,

    T. Braine, R. Cervantes, N. Crisosto, N. Du, S. Kimes, L. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, D. Bowring, A. Chou, et al., “Extended search for the invisible axion with the axion dark matter experiment,” Physical review letters 124 no. 10, (2020) 101303

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Relic abundance of dark photon dark matter,

    P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi, and F. Takahashi, “Relic abundance of dark photon dark matter,” Physics Letters B 801 (2020) 135136

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Physical Review Letters 85(10), 2200–2203 (2000)

    ADMX Collaboration Collaboration, C. Bartram, T. Braine, E. Burns, and et al, “Search for invisible axion dark matter in the 3 .3 − −4.2 µeV mass range,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (Dec, 2021) 261803. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 127.261803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2021

  59. [59]

    New ALPS Results on Hidden-Sector Lightweights

    K. Ehret et al., “New ALPS Results on Hidden-Sector Lightweights,” Phys. Lett. B 689 (2010) 149–155, arXiv:1004.1313 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    The Any Light Particle Search Experiment at DESY,

    ALPS Collaboration, K.-S. Isleif, “The Any Light Particle Search Experiment at DESY,” Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 77 no. 2, (2022) 120–125, arXiv:2202.07306 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Search for dark photons with superconducting radio frequency cavities,

    A. Romanenko et al., “Search for dark photons with superconducting radio frequency cavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (Jun, 2023) 261801. https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.261801 2023

  62. [62]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

    work page 1977

  63. [63]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797

    work page 1977

  64. [64]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

    work page 1978

  65. [65]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226

    work page 1978

  66. [66]

    Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, “Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127–132

    work page 1983

  67. [67]

    A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133–136. 37

    work page 1983

  68. [68]

    The Not So Harmless Axion,

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137–141

    work page 1983

  69. [69]

    Quadratic Coupling of the Axion to Photons,

    C. Beadle, S. A. R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, and P. N. Hoa Vuong, “Quadratic Coupling of the Axion to Photons,” 7, 2023

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    The Monodromic Axion-Photon Coupling,

    P. Agrawal and A. Platschorre, “The Monodromic Axion-Photon Coupling,” arXiv:2309.03934 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity,

    D. Carney, V. Domcke, and N. L. Rodd, “Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity,” arXiv:2308.12988 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, The physics of the dark photon: a primer . Springer, 2021

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,

    B. Holdom, “Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,” Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986) 196–198

    work page 1986

  74. [74]

    The Dark Photon

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, “The Dark Photon,” arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  75. [75]

    Dark photon limits: A handbook,

    A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, “Dark photon limits: A handbook,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 9, (2021) 095029, arXiv:2105.04565 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Wave dark matter,

    L. Hui, “Wave dark matter,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 59 (2021) 247–289

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Results from phase 1 of the HAYSTAC microwave cavity axion experiment

    HAYSTACCollaboration, L. Zhong et al., “Results from phase 1 of the HAYSTAC microwave cavity axion experiment,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 9, (2018) 092001, arXiv:1803.03690 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Deepest Sensitivity to Wavelike Dark Photon Dark Matter with SRF Cavities,

    R. Cervantes et al., “Deepest Sensitivity to Wavelike Dark Photon Dark Matter with SRF Cavities,” (8,

    work page

  79. [79]

    , arXiv:2208.03183 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    New results from HAYSTAC’s phase II operation with a squeezed state receiver,

    HAYSTACCollaboration, M. J. Jewell et al., “New results from HAYSTAC’s phase II operation with a squeezed state receiver,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 7, (2023) 072007, arXiv:2301.09721 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.