The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2311.09735 · v3 · pith:W77G5BI3 · submitted 2023-11-16 · cs.LG · cs.IR

GEO: Generative Engine Optimization

Reviewed by Pithpith:W77G5BI3open to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.IR
keywords generativeenginescontentenginecreatorsoptimizationqueriestextit
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The advent of large language models (LLMs) has ushered in a new paradigm of search engines that use generative models to gather and summarize information to answer user queries. This emerging technology, which we formalize under the unified framework of generative engines (GEs), can generate accurate and personalized responses, rapidly replacing traditional search engines like Google and Bing. Generative Engines typically satisfy queries by synthesizing information from multiple sources and summarizing them using LLMs. While this shift significantly improves $\textit{user}$ utility and $\textit{generative search engine}$ traffic, it poses a huge challenge for the third stakeholder -- website and content creators. Given the black-box and fast-moving nature of generative engines, content creators have little to no control over $\textit{when}$ and $\textit{how}$ their content is displayed. With generative engines here to stay, we must ensure the creator economy is not disadvantaged. To address this, we introduce Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), the first novel paradigm to aid content creators in improving their content visibility in generative engine responses through a flexible black-box optimization framework for optimizing and defining visibility metrics. We facilitate systematic evaluation by introducing GEO-bench, a large-scale benchmark of diverse user queries across multiple domains, along with relevant web sources to answer these queries. Through rigorous evaluation, we demonstrate that GEO can boost visibility by up to $40\%$ in generative engine responses. Moreover, we show the efficacy of these strategies varies across domains, underscoring the need for domain-specific optimization methods. Our work opens a new frontier in information discovery systems, with profound implications for both developers of generative engines and content creators.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Generative Engine Optimization at Scale: Measuring Brand Visibility Across AI Search Engines

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Large-scale analysis of AI engine responses shows brand visibility in three tiers (73%, 44%, 11%) with corporate sites and best-of listicles as top cited sources.

  2. Prominence-Stratified Failure Modes in Retrieval-Augmented Commercial Recommendation: A 37,000-Run Audit

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A large-scale audit of AI commercial recommendations reveals tier-specific failure modes: L1 brands reach recommendations but convert at 25-41%, L2 convert highest at 37-52%, L3 is an inflection point, and L4/L5 brand...

  3. Persona Conditioning of Brand Recommendations in Retrieval-Augmented Commercial Chat: A Prominence-Stratified Cross-Provider Audit

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Persona prefixes reduce brand recommendation Jaccard similarity by 0.12-0.20, with mid-market brands swapping up to 75% of recommendations while category leaders remain ~80% consistent across OpenAI and Anthropic models.

  4. Paraphrase Brittleness in Production Retrieval-Augmented Commercial Recommendation: Reproducibility Below the Rerun-Stability Baseline

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Paraphrase Jaccard similarity of 0.135-0.288 falls below the 0.50-0.61 same-prompt rerun baseline on OpenAI and Anthropic models, showing prompt wording dominates buyer intent in commercial recommendations.

  5. From Citation Selection to Citation Absorption: A Measurement Framework for Generative Engine Optimization Across AI Search Platforms

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A measurement study of 602 prompts across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity finds that citation selection breadth and absorption depth diverge, with high-influence pages being longer, structured, and evidence-rich.

  6. How Large Language Models Source Brand Reputation Across Languages and Markets

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLMs cite third-party domains for 85.7% of brand attributions, with Wikipedia dominant in most languages, a long-tailed domain distribution, and market-specific shifts such as YouTube and HR sites in Poland.

  7. Developer Experience with AI Coding Agents: HTTP Behavioral Signatures in Documentation Portals

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AI coding agents produce identifiable HTTP behavioral signatures and compress multi-page navigation into one or two requests, rendering standard engagement metrics unreliable.

  8. Divergent Recommendations, Convergent Diagnoses: Cross-Provider Failure-Mode Convergence in AI Commercial Recommendation

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Two major AI providers diverge in which brands they recommend but converge on classifying the failure reasons, especially for low-prominence brands.

  9. Beyond Retrieval: Modeling Confidence Decay and Deterministic Agentic Platforms in Generative Engine Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Deterministic multi-agent intent routing can reduce hallucinations in generative engines to near zero by limiting LLMs to intent routers and handing off tasks to specialized agents.