pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.12693 · v3 · submitted 2023-11-21 · 🧮 math.AP · math-ph· math.MP

NLS equation with competing inhomogeneous nonlinearities: ground states, blow-up, and scattering

Tianxiang Gou , Mohamed Majdoub , Tarek Saanouni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math-phmath.MP
keywords nonlinear Schrödinger equationinhomogeneous nonlinearitiesground statesscatteringblow-upcompeting termsinter-critical regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Solutions to the NLS with competing inhomogeneous nonlinearities scatter or blow up below the ground state energy threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a nonlinear Schrödinger equation featuring competing inhomogeneous nonlinear terms in a regime without scaling invariance. It characterizes the ground states of the stationary problem and then establishes a dichotomy: initial data with energy less than that of the ground state lead to either scattering or blow-up. This extends previous results by handling the lack of translation invariance due to the weights and the competition between focusing and defocusing terms. A reader would care because it provides a threshold criterion for global existence versus singularity formation in a more general class of equations.

Core claim

The equation admits ground states that are unique up to symmetry, nondegenerate, and unstable; below their energy level, the solution scatters to a free wave or blows up in finite time, with the proof relying on a scattering criterion and virial-type inequalities, and an upper bound on the blow-up rate is derived.

What carries the argument

The ground state energy threshold, defined variationally from the elliptic problem with the two competing power nonlinearities weighted by singular potentials.

If this is right

  • Ground states exist, are symmetric, decay at infinity, and are unstable.
  • Solutions with energy below the threshold either scatter or blow up.
  • The blow-up rate is bounded from above when blow-up occurs.
  • The dichotomy holds without scaling or translation invariance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could apply to other non-scale-invariant equations with position-dependent nonlinearities.
  • Simulations might reveal how the competition between terms affects the blow-up dynamics.
  • Extensions to higher dimensions or radial cases may follow similar lines.

Load-bearing premise

The parameters place the equation in the inter-critical regime where the competing terms yield a positive ground state energy that controls the long-time behavior.

What would settle it

A global solution with energy below the ground state energy that does not scatter would contradict the claimed dichotomy.

read the original abstract

We investigate a class of nonlinear equations of Schr\"odinger type with competing inhomogeneous nonlinearities in the non-radial inter-critical regime, \begin{align*} i \partial_t u +\Delta u &=|x|^{-b_1} |u|^{p_1-2} u - |x|^{-b_2} |u|^{p_2-2}u \quad \mbox{in} \,\, \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^N, \end{align*} where $N \geq 1$, $b_1, b_2>0$ and $p_1,p_2>2$. First, we establish the existence/nonexistence, symmetry, decay, uniqueness, non-degeneracy and instability of ground states. Then, we prove the scattering versus blowup below the ground state energy threshold. Our approach relies on Tao's scattering criterion and Dodson-Murphy's Virial/Morawetz inequalities. We also obtain an upper bound of the blow-up rate. The novelty here is that the equation does not enjoy any scaling invariance due to the presence of competing nonlinearities and the singular weights prevent the invariance by translation in the space variable. To the best of authors knowledge, this is the first time when inhomegeneous NLS equation with a focusing leading order nonlinearity and a defocusing perturbation is investigated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the NLS equation with competing inhomogeneous nonlinearities i∂_t u + Δu = |x|^{-b_1}|u|^{p_1-2}u - |x|^{-b_2}|u|^{p_2-2}u in the non-radial inter-critical regime (N ≥ 1, b_1, b_2 > 0, p_1, p_2 > 2). It first constructs and characterizes ground states (existence/nonexistence, symmetry, decay, uniqueness, non-degeneracy, instability). It then establishes a scattering-versus-blowup dichotomy below the ground-state energy threshold via Tao's scattering criterion and Dodson-Murphy virial/Morawetz inequalities, together with an upper bound on the blow-up rate. The setting lacks both scaling and translation invariance.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work supplies the first treatment of an inhomogeneous NLS with a focusing leading term and defocusing perturbation, extending the theory to a regime without scaling or translation invariance. The adaptation of Tao's criterion and Dodson-Murphy estimates to this competing-inhomogeneous setting, together with the ground-state analysis, constitutes a concrete advance.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The precise parameter restrictions defining the non-radial inter-critical regime are described as implicit in the setup; an explicit list of the admissible ranges for p_1, p_2, b_1, b_2 and N should appear in the introduction or §2.
  2. Notation for the ground-state energy threshold E_* (or equivalent) is used before it is defined; introducing it immediately after the ground-state existence result would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its novelty in addressing the inhomogeneous NLS with competing nonlinearities in the absence of scaling and translation invariance, and the recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the summary of our results on ground states and the scattering/blow-up dichotomy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs ground-state existence, symmetry, uniqueness and instability results for the given inhomogeneous NLS, then applies Tao's scattering criterion together with Dodson-Murphy virial/Morawetz estimates to obtain the scattering-versus-blow-up dichotomy below the energy threshold. All cited tools are external (Tao, Dodson-Murphy) and the equation lacks scaling invariance by construction of the competing terms; no step reduces by definition to a fitted parameter, self-citation load-bearing premise, or ansatz imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation is therefore self-contained against standard functional-analytic machinery.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard Sobolev embeddings, concentration-compactness arguments, and virial identities adapted to inhomogeneous weights; no new entities are postulated and no parameters are fitted to data.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Sobolev and Strichartz estimates hold for the inhomogeneous weights |x|^{-b_i}
    Invoked implicitly to control the nonlinear terms in the inter-critical regime.
  • domain assumption The ground state energy threshold is well-defined and positive under the stated parameter conditions
    Required for the scattering/blow-up dichotomy to be meaningful.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 1359 out tokens · 19735 ms · 2026-05-24T05:50:58.850679+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aloui and S

    L. Aloui and S. Tayachi, Local well-posedness for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schr ¨ odinger equation, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst., 41 (2021) 5409–5437

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    A. H. Ardila and M. Cardoso, Blow-up solutions and strong instability of ground states f or the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 20 (2021) 101–119

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    A. K. Arora, B. Dodson and J. Murphy, Scattering below the ground state for the 2d radial nonlinea r Schr¨ odinger equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 148 (2020), 1653–1663

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Bartsch, T

    T. Bartsch, T. Weth and M. Willem, Partial symmetry of least energy nodal solutions to some var iational problems, J. Anal. Math., 96 (2005), 1–18

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Bellazzini, L

    J. Bellazzini, L. Forcella and V. Georgiev Ground state energy threshold and blow-up for NLS with compe ting nonlinearities, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), 24 (2023), 955–988

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Bellazzini, V

    J. Bellazzini, V. D. Dinh and L. Forcella, Scattering for non-radial 3D NLS with combined nonlinearit ies, arXiv:2209.01600

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Belmonte-Beitia, V

    J. Belmonte-Beitia, V. M. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, V. Vekslerchik and P. J. Torres, Lie symmetries and solitons in nonlinear systems with spatially inhomogeneous nonlinearities , Phys. Rev. Lett., 98 (2007), 064102

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    J. E. Brothers and W. P. Ziemer, Minimal rearrangements of Sobolev functions , J. Reine Angew. Math., 384 (1988), 153–179

    work page 1988

  9. [9]

    Campos, Scattering of radial solutions to the inhomogeneous nonlin ear Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinear Anal., 202 (2021), Paper No

    L. Campos, Scattering of radial solutions to the inhomogeneous nonlin ear Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinear Anal., 202 (2021), Paper No. 112118, 17 pp

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Campos and M

    L. Campos and M. Cardoso, A virial-Morawetz approach to scattering for the non-radia l inhomogeneous NLS , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 150 (2022) 2007–2021

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Cardoso, L

    M. Cardoso, L. G. Farah, C. M. Guzm´ an and J. Murphy, Scattering below the ground state for the intercritical non-radial inhomogeneous NLS , Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 68 (2022), Paper No. 103687, 19 pp

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Cazenave, Semilinear Schr¨ odinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, AMS, 2003

    T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schr¨ odinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, AMS, 2003. 46 T. GOU, M. MAJDOUB & T. SAANOUNI

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Chen, On a class of nonlinear inhomogeneous Schr¨ odinger equatio n, J

    J. Chen, On a class of nonlinear inhomogeneous Schr¨ odinger equatio n, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 32 (2010), 237–253

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Chen and B

    J. Chen and B. Guo, Sharp global existence and blowing up results for inhomogen eous Schr¨ odinger equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 8 (2007), 357–367

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Cheng, C

    X. Cheng, C. Miao and L. Zhao, Global well-posedness and scattering for nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equations with combined nonlinearities in the radial case , J. Differential Equations, 261 (2016), 2881–2934

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Hezzi, A

    H. Hezzi, A. Marzouk and T. Saanouni, A Note on the Inhomogeneous Schr¨ odinger Equation with Mixe d Power Nonlinearity, Commun. Math. Anal., 18 (2015), 34–53

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Y. Cho, S. Hong and K. Lee, On the global well-posedness of focusing energy-critical i nhomogeneous NLS , J. Evol. Equ., 20 (2020) 1349–1380

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Cho and K

    Y. Cho and K. Lee, On the focusing energy-critical inhomogeneous NLS: weight ed space approach , Nonlinear Anal., 205 (2021), Paper No. 112261, 21 pp

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Coffman, Uniqueness of the ground state solution for ∆u − u + u3 = 0 and a variational characterization of other solutions , Arch

    C.V. Coffman, Uniqueness of the ground state solution for ∆u − u + u3 = 0 and a variational characterization of other solutions , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 46 (1972), 81–95

    work page 1972

  20. [20]

    Combet and F

    V. Combet and F. Genoud, Classification of minimal mass blow-up solutions for an L2 critical inhomogeneous NLS, J. Evol. Equ., 16 (2016), 483–500

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Dancer and S

    E. Dancer and S. Santra, Singular perturbed problems in the zero mass case: asymptot ic behavior of spikes , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 189 (2010), 185–225

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Dancer, S

    E. Dancer, S. Santra and J. Wei, Asymptotic behavior of the least energy solution of a proble m with competing powers, J. Funct. Anal., 261 (2011), 2094–2134

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Dinh, Blowup of H 1 solutions for a class of the focusing inhomogeneous nonline ar Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinear Anal., 174 (2018), 169–188

    V.D. Dinh, Blowup of H 1 solutions for a class of the focusing inhomogeneous nonline ar Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinear Anal., 174 (2018), 169–188

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Dinh and S

    V.D. Dinh and S. Keraani, Long time dynamics of non-radial solutions to inhomogeneou s nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 54 (2021), 4765–4811

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    V. D. Dinh, M. Majdoub and T. Saanouni, Long time dynamics and blow-up for the focusing inhomogeneo us nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with spatially growing nonlinearity, J. Math. Phys., 64 (2023), Paper No. 081509, 41 pp

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Dodson and J

    B. Dodson and J. Murphy, A new proof of scattering below the ground state for the 3D rad ial focusing cubic NLS , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 145 (2017), 4859–4867

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Dodson and J

    B. Dodson and J. Murphy, A new proof of scattering below the ground state for the non-r adial focusing NLS , Math. Res. Lett., 25 (2018), 1805–1825

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Duyckaerts, J

    T. Duyckaerts, J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, Scattering for the non-radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odin ger equa- tion, Math. Res. Lett., 15 (2008), 1233–1250

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    D. Fang, J. Xie and T. Cazenave, Scattering for the focusing energy-subcritical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Sci. China Math., 54 (2011), 2037–2062

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    L. G. Farah, Global well-posedness and blow-up on the energy space for th e inhomogeneous nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation J. Evol. Equ., 16 (2016), 193–208

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    L. G. Farah and C. M. Guzm´ an, Scattering for the radial 3D cubic focusing inhomogeneous n onlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Differential Equations, 262 (2017), 4175–4231

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Fibich and X.-P

    G. Fibich and X.-P. Wang, Stability of solitary waves for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equ ations with inhomogeneous nonlinearities, Phys. D , 175 (2003), 96–108

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Foschi, Inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates , J

    D. Foschi, Inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates , J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ., 2 (2005), 1–24

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    Genoud, A uniqueness result for ∆u − λu + V (|x|)up = 0 on R2, Adv

    F. Genoud, A uniqueness result for ∆u − λu + V (|x|)up = 0 on R2, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 11 (2011), 483–491

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Genoud, An inhomogeneous, L2-critical, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Z

    F. Genoud, An inhomogeneous, L2-critical, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Z. Anal. Anwend., 31 (2012), 283– 290

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Genoud and C

    F. Genoud and C. A. Stuart, Schr¨ odinger equations with a spatially decaying nonlinearity, existence and stability of standing waves , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 21 (2008), 137–186

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Ghoussoub, Duality and Perturbation Methods in Critical Point Theory , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol

    N. Ghoussoub, Duality and Perturbation Methods in Critical Point Theory , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 107, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993

    work page 1993

  38. [38]

    Gill, Optical guiding of laser beam in nonuniform plasma , Pramana, 55 (2000), 835–842

    T.S. Gill, Optical guiding of laser beam in nonuniform plasma , Pramana, 55 (2000), 835–842. COMPETING INLS 47

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Ginibre, G

    J. Ginibre, G. Velo, On a class of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. I. The Cauch y problem, general case , J. Functional Analysis, 32 (1979), 1–32

    work page 1979

  40. [40]

    Glassey, On the blowing up of solutions to the Cauchy problem for nonli near Schr¨ odinger equations, J

    R.T. Glassey, On the blowing up of solutions to the Cauchy problem for nonli near Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Math. Phys., 18 (1977), 1794–1797

    work page 1977

  41. [41]

    Guzm´ an, On well posedness for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schr¨ odi nger equation , Nonlinear Anal

    C.M. Guzm´ an, On well posedness for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schr¨ odi nger equation , Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 37 (2017), 249–286

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Guzm´ an and J

    C.M. Guzm´ an and J. Murphy, Scattering for the non-radial energy-critical inhomogene ous NLS , J. Differential Equations, 295 (2021), 187–210

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Hajaiej and C

    H. Hajaiej and C. A. Stuart, On the variational approach to the stability of standing wav es for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 4 (2004), 469–501

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Holmer and S

    J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, A sharp condition for scattering of the radial 3D cubic nonli near Schr¨ odinger equations, Commun Math Phys., 282 (2008), 435–467

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Kato, Growth properties of solutions of the reduced wave equation with a variable coefficient , Comm

    T. Kato, Growth properties of solutions of the reduced wave equation with a variable coefficient , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 12 (1959), 403–425

    work page 1959

  46. [46]

    Keel and T

    M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates , Amer. J. Math., 120 (1998), 955–980

    work page 1998

  47. [47]

    C. E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow up for the energ ycritical, focusing, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math., 166 (2006), 645–675

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    Killip, J

    R. Killip, J. Murphy and M. Visan, Scattering for the cubic-quintic NLS, crossing the virial t hreshold, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 53 (2021), 5803–5812

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Killip, T

    R. Killip, T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu and M. Visan, Solitons and scattering for the cubic-quintic nonlinear Sc hr¨ odinger equation on R3, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 225 (2017), 469–548

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Killip and M

    R. Killip and M. Visan, The focusing energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa tion in dimensions five and higher, Amer. J. Math., 132 (2010) , 361–424

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Kivshar and G

    Y.S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals , Academic Press 2003

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    M. K. Kwong, Uniqueness of positive solutions of ∆u − u + up = 0 in Rn, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 105 (1989), 243–266

    work page 1989

  53. [53]

    Lieb and M

    E.H. Lieb and M. Loss, Analysis, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, AMS, Providence, Rhode I sland, 2001

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus o f variations

    P-L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus o f variations. The locally compact case, part II, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e, Anal. Non Lin´ eaire,1 (1984), 223–283

    work page 1984

  55. [55]

    Liu and V

    C.S. Liu and V. K. Tripathi, Laser guiding in an axially nonuniform plasma channel , Phys. Plasmas, 1 (1994), 3100–3103

    work page 1994

  56. [56]

    Liu, X.-P

    Y. Liu, X.-P. Wang and K. Wang, Instability of standing waves of the Schr¨ odinger equation with inhomogeneous nonlinearity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 358 (2006), 2105–2122

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Merle, Determination of blow-up solutions with minimal mass for no nlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with critical power, Duke Math

    F. Merle, Determination of blow-up solutions with minimal mass for no nlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with critical power, Duke Math. J., 69 (1993), 427–454

    work page 1993

  58. [58]

    Merle, Nonexistence of minimal blow-up solutions of equations iut = − ∆u − k(x)|u|4/Nu in RN , Ann

    F. Merle, Nonexistence of minimal blow-up solutions of equations iut = − ∆u − k(x)|u|4/Nu in RN , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor.,64 (1996), 33–85

    work page 1996

  59. [59]

    Merle and P

    F. Merle and P. Rapha¨ el, On universality of blow-up profile for the L2-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Invent. Math., 156 (2004), 565–672

    work page 2004

  60. [60]

    Merle and P

    F. Merle and P. Rapha¨ el,Blow-up dynamic and upper bound on the blow-up rate for criti cal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Ann. of Math., 16 (2005), 157–222

    work page 2005

  61. [61]

    Merle and P

    F. Merle and P. Rapha¨ el, On a sharp lower bound on the blow-up rate for the L2-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 19 (2006), 37–90

    work page 2006

  62. [62]

    Merle, P

    F. Merle, P. Rapha¨ el and J. Szeftel, On collapsing ring blow-up solutions to the mass supercriti cal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Duke Math. J., 163 (2014), 369–431

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Merle and Y

    F. Merle and Y. Tsutsumi, L2 concentration of blow up solutions for the nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation with critical power nonlinearity , J. Differential Equations, 84 (1990), 205–214

    work page 1990

  64. [64]

    C. Miao, J. Murphy and J. Zheng, Scattering for the non-radial inhomogeneous NLS , Math. Res. Lett., 28 (2021), 1481–1504

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    C. Miao, G. Xu, and L. Zhao, The dynamics of the 3D radial NLS with the combined terms , Comm. Math. Phys., 318 (2013), 767–808. 48 T. GOU, M. MAJDOUB & T. SAANOUNI

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    C. Miao, T. Zhao and J. Zheng, On the 4D nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with combined terms under the energy threshold, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 56 (2017), Paper No. 179, 39 pp

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Ogawa and Y

    T. Ogawa and Y. Tsutsumi, Blow-up of H 1 solutions for the one-dimensional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with critical power nonlinearity , Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 111 (1991), 487–96

    work page 1991

  68. [68]

    Oh, On positive multi-lump bound states of nonlinear Schr¨ odin ger equations under multiple well potential , Comm

    Y.G. Oh, On positive multi-lump bound states of nonlinear Schr¨ odin ger equations under multiple well potential , Comm. Math. Phys., 131 (1990), 223–253

    work page 1990

  69. [69]

    Raphae ¨l and J

    P. Raphae ¨l and J. Szeftel, Existence and uniqueness of minimal blow-up solutions to an inhomogeneous mass critical NLS , J. Amer. Math. Soc., 24 (2011), 471–546

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Shioji and K

    N. Shioji and K. Watanabe, A generalized Pohozaev identity and uniqueness of positive radial solutions of ∆u + g(r)u + h(r)up = 0, J. Differential Equations, 255 (2013), 4448–4475

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Shioji and K

    N. Shioji and K. Watanabe, Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of positive radial solutions of div(ρ∇ u) + ρ(− gu + hup) = 0, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 55 (2016), Art. 32, 42 pp

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Stefanov, On the normalized ground states of second order PDE’s with mi xed power non-linearities , Comm

    A. Stefanov, On the normalized ground states of second order PDE’s with mi xed power non-linearities , Comm. Math. Phys., 369 (2019), 929–971

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    W. A. Strauss, Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions , Comm. Math. Phys., 55 (1977), 149–162

    work page 1977

  74. [74]

    Van Schaftingen, Explicit approximation of the symmetric rearrangement by p olarizations, Arch

    J. Van Schaftingen, Explicit approximation of the symmetric rearrangement by p olarizations, Arch. Math., 93 (2009), 181–190

    work page 2009

  75. [75]

    Yanagida, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of ∆u + g(r)u + h(r)up = 0 in Rn, Arch

    E. Yanagida, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of ∆u + g(r)u + h(r)up = 0 in Rn, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 115 (1991), 257–274

    work page 1991

  76. [76]

    Yanagida, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of ∆u+f (u, |x|) = 0, Nonlinear Anal., 19 (1992), 1143–1154

    E. Yanagida, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions of ∆u+f (u, |x|) = 0, Nonlinear Anal., 19 (1992), 1143–1154

    work page 1992

  77. [77]

    Sulem and P.-L

    C. Sulem and P.-L. Sulem, The Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse , Appl. Math. Sci., 139, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999

    work page 1999

  78. [78]

    Tao, On the asymptotic behavior of large radial data for a focusin g non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation, Dyn

    T. Tao, On the asymptotic behavior of large radial data for a focusin g non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation, Dyn. Partial. Differ. Equ., 1 (2004), 1–48

    work page 2004

  79. [79]

    Tao, Nonlinear Dispersive Equations: Local and Global Analysis , CBMS Reg

    T. Tao, Nonlinear Dispersive Equations: Local and Global Analysis , CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math., 106, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006

    work page 2006

  80. [80]

    T. Tao, M. Visan and Y. Zhang, The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with combined power-t ype nonlinearities , Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 32 (2007), 1281–1343

    work page 2007

Showing first 80 references.