mathbb{Z}₂times mathbb{Z}₂ Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks: Benchmarking against Classical Neural Networks
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:C7M5YOYSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance of Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks (EQNN) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN), juxtaposed against their classical counterparts: Equivariant Neural Networks (ENN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). We evaluate the performance of each network with two toy examples for a binary classification task, focusing on model complexity (measured by the number of parameters) and the size of the training data set. Our results show that the $\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ EQNN and the QNN provide superior performance for smaller parameter sets and modest training data samples.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.