The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent Thinking
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:JV3EVD5Arecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Generative AI systems have been heralded as tools for augmenting human creativity and inspiring divergent thinking, though with little empirical evidence for these claims. This paper explores the effects of exposure to AI-generated images on measures of design fixation and divergent thinking in a visual ideation task. Through a between-participants experiment (N=60), we found that support from an AI image generator during ideation leads to higher fixation on an initial example. Participants who used AI produced fewer ideas, with less variety and lower originality compared to a baseline. Our qualitative analysis suggests that the effectiveness of co-ideation with AI rests on participants' chosen approach to prompt creation and on the strategies used by participants to generate ideas in response to the AI's suggestions. We discuss opportunities for designing generative AI systems for ideation support and incorporating these AI tools into ideation workflows.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HistoryPalette: Supporting Exploration and Reuse of Past Alternatives in Image Generation and Editing
HistoryPalette provides a palette interface for exploring and reusing prior design alternatives in generative image creation and editing, evaluated via user studies with creative professionals and client collaborators.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.